The helicopters are coming

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

This post is a guest contribution by Niels Jensen*, chief executive partner of London-based Absolute Return Partners.

It is time to move on. Not that the crisis is over, by no stretch of the imagination. But it is not going to make one iota of difference if I join the blame game bandwagon. It is what it is. Allow me instead to focus my energy on what is likely to happen next. That is more productive and definitely more useful.

A can of worms
We are dealing with a rather large can of worms. The lid is off and the worms are all over the place. Let’s focus on what these worms might be up to. For all the fireworks that the financial sector provides at the moment, at the end of the day, it is the damage done to the real economy that matters to the average household.

In the situation we currently find ourselves in, it is very easy to get distracted and lose sight of the bigger picture. All eyes are on Wall Street, obviously with good reason, but there are important dynamics which are being largely ignored. Let’s focus on those.

Will $700 billion be enough?
Buying $700 billion worth of toxic mortgage securities from a heavily bleeding banking industry isn’t going to make the problem go away. Firstly, $700 billion is not enough to cure the disease and, secondly, mortgages aren’t the whole problem. What will happen when consumers stop paying off their credit cards or auto loans? The reckless lending standards of recent years are not isolated to mortgages. It is quite possible that Hank Paulson may have to come back and ask for a second installment.

That doesn’t make Paulson’s plan a bad first step, though. In the current environment, doing nothing is not an option and all those who have opposed the plan, including the “mental midgets and moral pigmies” in Congress (quote taken from Woody Brock), should shut up and work with the Treasurer to move things forward. The United States, and the rest of the world, cannot afford for some narrow minded, re-election focused egotists to take the entire world down.

Europe is skating on thin ice
And neither is the problem unique to the United States. Many European banks have been equally lax, and at least some of these banks are not as well capitalised as their US peers. This week alone, the governments of Ireland and Greece have had to underwrite the entire banking sector, and banking giants such as Dexia, Fortis, Hypo Real and Bradford & Bingley have all been rescued in recent days. So don’t kid yourself if you read these lines from your comfy chair in Athens, Barcelona, Copenhagen or Dublin. Europe is getting sucked into this crisis whether it likes it or not.

So is Asia …
And don’t even think for one second that Asia can escape the crisis. According to estimates from Simon Hunt Strategic Services, as a percentage of GDP, China’s exports have grown from 23% in 2000 to 41% in the first half of 2008. Do you honestly think China, and the rest of Asia can escape a recession in Europe and North America? China’s stock market has already smelled a rat and has sold off to the tune of 70% from its high in 2007.

Banks are obviously acutely aware of the high counterparty risk at present and their wariness is best exemplified through the recent explosion in Libor rates (see Chart 1 below).

Chart 1: USD Libor Rates

abs-1.jpg

Source: Financial Times

It is critical that the inter-bank market doesn’t break down completely. If it does, lending will dry up very quickly and the damage to the real economy will be devastating. That’s why we cannot afford for Paulson’s plan not to go through. Trust in the banking system must be preserved at almost any price.

The recession is coming
Now to the good news. In a couple of years’ time, when the dust has settled and (some sort of) normality has returned, I believe that the last week of September 2008 will be remembered as the pinnacle of the financial crisis. We will remember the day (last Monday) when banks in seven different countries had to be bailed out on the same day. We will remember Wall Street suffering its largest points loss ever.

That, however, is not the same as suggesting that the worst of the economic crisis is now behind us. We’d better prepare for a long and painful winter. The US economy is almost certainly in recession already (more about this later); so is the UK economy. Continental Europe is probably not quite there yet, although the very latest data suggests that France has now tipped over. It is probably fair to assume that, by the first or second quarter of next year, large parts of Europe should be in recession.

Not as strong as it looks
Many commentators dropped their lower jaw in disbelief when the second quarter GDP report for the US economy was released in mid-September. Some even suggested foul play. Admittedly, all anecdotal evidence pointed towards a weak number, so it is no wonder that almost everyone was a bit surprised to see second quarter US real GDP growth being revised up to 3.3%.

So what happened? It may sound strange but there is a simple explanation – the fact that oil prices rose from $101 to $140 per barrel during the quarter. In order to understand how rising oil prices can have such an effect on real (inflation-adjusted) GDP, consider the following equations:

(a) Nominal GDP = Consumption + Investments + Government Spending + Exports – Imports

(b) Real GDP = Nominal GDP ÷ GDP Deflator (The GDP deflator measures the difference between real and nominal GDP.)

Now assume that, in a given quarter, the volume of every component is unchanged. This would obviously mean that real GDP would be unchanged. At the same time, assume that import prices rise during the quarter (as was the case in the second quarter). Nominal GDP would fall as the value of total imports would rise. As a result, rising import prices lower the GDP deflator which is used to convert nominal GDP into real GDP. Therefore, as the GDP deflator was lowered in Q2, it had the effect of pushing real GDP higher. Bingo!

Prepare for a shock number
My apologies for getting a bit technical there, but I hope I have demonstrated to you that it was neither manipulation nor Mickey Mouse economics which created the surprisingly strong GDP number for the US economy in the second quarter. It was pure and simple accounting techniques which had a bigger than usual impact because of the enormous rise in the oil price during April, May and June. Mind you, almost by magic, the oil price fell back to $100 from $140 during the third quarter of this year. So, when they eventually report third quarter GDP growth, the GDP deflator will be much higher than in the second quarter, and the real GDP number could therefore be shockingly low.

Foreign trade performs well
One of the few highlights in an otherwise rather sick US economy is the performance of foreign trade. As you can see from Chart 2a below, if you back out oil imports, foreign trade has performed extremely well over the past couple of years and continues to do so. As I have discussed this chart with various different people, I have received virtually the same instinctive response every time – it is because imports are falling. Not true. Even a quick glance at Chart 2b makes it abundantly clear that US exports continue to perform very well. The weak dollar is clearly helping US exporters.

Chart 2a: US Trade Balance

abs-2.jpg

Chart 2b: US Trade Balance

abs-3.jpg

Source: www.econbrowser.com

Obviously, one might argue that it is only a question of time before US exports fall off the cliff. Maybe, but that’s not where I am going with this. Much more interesting is the impact this is having on foreign exchange reserves – and therefore on global liquidity – around the world.

Reserves stand at $7 trillion
When the United States runs a massive trade (and current account) deficit, as it has done for a number of years now, it has the effect of boosting US dollar reserves in other countries. No wonder that central banks’ foreign exchange reserves have exploded in recent years. When we entered the 21st century less than a decade ago, global foreign exchange reserves stood at about $2,000 billion. Now global reserves exceed $7,000 billion. The reserves are concentrated in Asia with China, Japan, Russia, Taiwan, India and South Korea accounting for 60% of total reserves between them.

But growth has stalled …
Approximately 60% of these reserves are held in US dollars, most of which have been invested in government bonds. The improvement of the US non-oil trade balance has had the effect of slowing the growth of foreign exchange reserves in Asia to almost a standstill. Some countries (e.g. South Korea) have actually experienced a drop in their FX reserves over the past 12 months. A continuation of this trend is bullish for the US dollar but bearish for Asian currencies.

It also explains why global bond markets have done so well in recent years despite evidence of rising inflation problems. About $5 trillion of FX reserves have had to be invested since the turn of the Millennium – much of it in government bonds. Imagine the stimulus such a vast amount of money has provided to bond prices. No wonder inflation worries have been largely ignored by global bond markets!

Don’t worry about inflation
Now, I am going to make a prediction that I may live to regret but the current turmoil in financial markets is about as deflationary as it comes. Don’t worry about inflation! This crisis will kill inflation more effectively than anyone wants. A year from now, possibly even sooner, deflation will be firmly back on the agenda. Given the massive interventions (read: spending of taxpayers’ money) taking place on both sides of the Atlantic at the moment, no government can live with such prospects. Debt + Deflation = Devastation!

And now to the helicopters …
Bernanke’s helicopters should therefore take off soon and you should expect dollar notes to be dumped in massive amounts. On this side of the Atlantic, the Bank of England and the European Central Bank are both desperately awaiting a glimmer of good news on the inflation front which will allow them to start cutting rates again. Don’t be surprised to see rates over here being cut in half over the next twelve months.

The risks attached to such aggressive monetary easing are limited at this stage. The global economy is facing substantial weakening and money growth has slowed significantly in recent months – just take a look at Chart 3 below.

Chart 3: US Money Growth
abs-4b.jpg

Conclusion
For those two reasons, and assuming I am correct about the inflation outlook, it is a low-risk strategy for the Fed, BoE and the ECB to become far more aggressive with their monetary easing. The next few months will define the economic climate for years to come. If the hawks in Frankfurt and London prevail, the outlook is dim to say the least. However, if they step up now, the coming recession may not be particularly deep.

The stock market should react reasonably well to such aggressive monetary easing but, to paraphrase our friends at Cardano, if anything, the Lehman bankruptcy has forced equity investors to confront the full scale of the financial crisis, which they have been trying to ignore for some time. And, despite the recent sell-off, there is still little value to be found in equities compared to the deep discounts on offer in the credit markets.

Source: Niels Jensen, Absolute Return Partners, October 3, 2008.

* Niels Jensen has 24 years of investment banking, private banking and asset management experience. He began his career at Andelsbanken (now Nordea) in Copenhagen and was part of a generation of bankers building a new industry in Denmark, following the Central Bank of Denmark’s relaxation of rules governing investments abroad in 1984.

In 1986, he joined Shearson Lehman in London, where he built up the firm’s equity franchise in Scandinavia. In 1989, he joined Goldman Sachs with a similar mandate, i.e. to establish a Scandinavian franchise for Goldman. In 1992, he became Co-Head of Goldman’s U.S. equity business in Europe, a post he held until 1996, when he joined Oppenheimer in London and became its Head of Europe.

Following CIBC’s acquisition of Oppenheimer, Lehman Brothers bought Oppenheimer’s European private banking operation in 1999, and Niels found himself back at the firm he left ten years earlier, now in charge of its European Private Wealth Management business. Whilst at Lehman Brothers, he developed the concept of investing that has now been put into effect at Absolute Return Partners.

In December 2006 Niels was appointed as a Director of Trafalgar House Trustees Limited, advising one of the UK’s leading corporate pension funds on its investment strategy.

Niels is a founding Partner of Absolute Return Partners LLP and its Chief Executive Partner. He is a graduate of University of Copenhagen with a Masters Degree in economics.

Related article:
Global liquidity crisis: What now?

 

Did you enjoy this post? If so, click here to subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.

 

OverSeas Radio Network

7 comments to The helicopters are coming

  • chris

    When (or if) this massive growth in money supply has the desired effect, they are going to have to mop up like never before.i think this is the set-up of (future) global hyper-inflation as USD weakness knocks on.

  • Wayne

    The comments like “mental midgets” make me want to enlarge my garden and start living on wild game. We mental midgets balance our check book each month. The mental giants that created/caused the mess berate us and demand more money. Nothing has changed, the same greedy “mental giants” are running the financial sector. I may be simple minded but if my son wastes his allowance I don’t give him more to just piss off again. He will get more to cover necessities but I am not giving him a blank check.
    There was a market for these securities the tax payers have purchased, I understand it is around $0.25 on the dollar. The market siezed up. I wonder why. Paulson and his buddies knew that the market would have to sieze for him to convince congress that the world was coming to an end unless they gave him a blank check. Of course no one was going to move any paper.
    Why is it rates can’t go up? I hear no one will lend money, then you hear of some one paying 10% to borrow and that is criminal. Why? If we keep money cheap (what you are advocating above “helicopter ben”) then wall street will always gamble it away, it is monopoly money. Make them pay for it and maybe they will take better care.

  • The Assetman

    The massive de-leveraging taking place in an of itself, is deflationary. You would think the ECB would grasp a clue here.

  • Mark Goodfellow

    “Trust in the banking system must be preserved at almost any price?” We are speaking of mental midgets and moral pygmies here; and also dulusional loons. The banking system must crash, ruined by the people it rewarded most handsomely.
    Maybe we ought to ask those who are required to pay “almost any price” for the idiot bankers and corrupt politicians who have, in their arrogance and stupidity, ruined the good deal they had going for themselves (and the rest of us); before we rob innocents to pay for their mistakes.
    For those of you who lived in the big money, masters of the universe world, it’s end must be unthinkable. Not so much to those of us who have never been involved.
    We just don’t want to have to pay for your breathtaking incompetence. You screwed up; take your medicine like a big boy, quit whinning, and start over; just like us simple folk do. The world you loved is gone. You were the ones who destroyed it.

  • Ginger

    I just cannot understand why the long term effect of unbelievable additions to the US national debt that will be a consequence of this crisis wont be severely inflationary. As I see it, we will never be able to repay it; the only way out will be to collapse the dollar, jacking long term interest rates way up. Sure, right now, everyone world wide is scared and running home to momma USDollar, and sure right now, no one in the world will be buying anything. But long term, I just don’t see how we can maintain the value of the dollar or keep long term rates from zooming up. Could someone please explain why my reasoning here is faulty? Thanks!

  • Bill

    “A year from now deflation will be back on the agenda.” So we are massively inflating now via helicopter money but a year from now we will be worrying about deflation? If Jensen did not actually mean to write that “inflation” will be back on the agenda a year from now, that sentence is curious. In fact, that entire paragraph needs more work. Very punchy but not logical.

  • I feel compelled to respond to a couple of the comments above.

    Wayne first:
    My reference to “mental midgets” when referring to US congressmen was based on my frustration over their narrow-minded behaviour (worrying about re-election rather than the nation’s well-being). I absolutely agree with you that the behaviour (read: greed) in some parts of the financial services industry has been unacceptable to say the least, but that was not the point I was trying to make.

    To Ginger and Bill:
    De-leveraging is very deflationary, and de-leveraging is by no means over yet. Just think of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley both of which have to slim down their 30-40x levered balance sheets to 10-13x in order to adjust to the new banking reality. Or think of all the commercial banks around the world which can’t raise enough new capital to replace lost capital. Their only option is downsizing their balance sheets. This will have significant implications for all kinds of borrowers and will reduce economic growth for years to come – all very deflationary. I do not wish to sound like a scaremonger, but the best comparisons are the early 1870s (huge European banking crisis) and the early 1930s (great depression), both of which created serious deflationary pressure. The risk of inflation is VERY low the first few years; however, Bill is right that it may reemerge further down the road as the economic wheels start to spin faster again. That scenario is several years away, though. We will have plenty of time to worry about deflation before we get there.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Top 100 Financial Blogs

Recent Posts

Charts & Indexes

Gold Price (US$)

Don Coxe’s Weekly Webcast

Podcast – Dow Jones


One minute - every hour - weekdays
(requires Windows Media Player)
newsflashr network
National Debt Clock

Calendar of Posts

Feed the Bull