Major hurdles to stimulus

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

This post is a guest contribution by Richard Berner of Morgan Stanley.

Hopes are strong that a combination of timely fiscal stimulus and a fix for the financial system will end the US and global recession and promote recovery. Eventually, we think they will, but there are three major hurdles.

First, only 20% of the $819 billion fiscal stimulus package moving through the Congress will occur in FY2009, much of the spending and tax cut thrust will be deferred into 2010 and 2011, and it would be difficult to accelerate the spending.

Second, any plan to clean up lenders’ balance sheets, mitigate mortgage foreclosures and recapitalize lenders will also take time. Encouragingly, the Fed’s January Survey of Bank Lending Practices suggests that banks stopped tightening their lending standards last month. But credit is still tight. For example, “only” 47.5% of respondents (on a weighted-average basis) reported tightening their mortgage lending standards last month versus 79% in July, and an index of willingness to lend to consumers bounced to -16% from -47.2% in October. But both readings still indicate a bigger credit crunch than any in the survey’s history, and the cumulative impact of past tightening is still working its way through the economy with a lag.

Finally, and reflecting that lag, declining output, prices, and profits are connected in a vicious circle that is unlikely to abate soon. Pricing power is dwindling and margins are shrinking, in turn weakening corporate credit quality, access to credit, and capital spending. Although GDP declined by a less-than-expected 3.8% in the fourth quarter of 2008, the upshot is that we expect the economy to weaken further through the first half of 2009.

One more macro risk keeps us awake at night: Recessions always raise the threat of protectionism, and the threat of barriers to trade and capital flows this time may be especially high. Globalization has knit economies closer in the past two decades, bringing benefits for consumers but pressure on companies and workers in developed markets. Efforts to protect old jobs rather than create new ones would prolong the global recession, hobble productivity and raise the specter of stagflation. Signs of incipient protectionism and trade tensions are rising: Some EM countries have raised employment barriers. Officials in various countries have discussed directing credit from institutions that receive government assistance to domestic borrowers only. The US stimulus package contains Buy American clauses. And US officials are revisiting the question of whether China is manipulating its currency. None of these creates a favorable backdrop for financial markets.

Source: Morgan Stanley, February 5, 2009.

 

Did you enjoy this post? If so, click here to subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.

OverSeas Radio Network

2 comments to Major hurdles to stimulus

  • Assetman

    The reality is that macro risks are around us all the time. The difference this time is we can see it right in front of our faces. It’s an ugly old fart, too.

  • TerryF

    I notice that insider “experts” such as are represented in Morgan Stanley are all bringing up the “protectionist” label now. Have heard it repeatedly, even from Europe. The fact is in the U.S. we have always maintained a large degree of “free” trade. The so-called “free trade” agreements are like legs on a snake- totally unnecessary to conduct free trade. All they do is undermine U.S. trade sovereignty by make us accountable to international bodies like the WTO. They enable controlled trade rather than free trade and give advantages to multi-national Corporations over smaller domestic firms. This has been reflected in the decline of the smaller firms and the rise of the multi nationals as well as the transfer of manufacturing to foreign nations. The “experts” from the Morgan Stanley’s of the world are the one’s who created our current economic debacle and listening to their advice is about useful as placing proverbial legs on the snake. We need true free trade which means withdrawal from the controlled trade “free trade” agreements and UN based control organizations like the WTO and not the methods advocated by these guys which protects their interests over that of majority. They are the protectionists calling the kettle black and should be ignored not venerated.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Top 100 Financial Blogs

Recent Posts

Charts & Indexes

Gold Price (US$)

Don Coxe’s Weekly Webcast

Podcast – Dow Jones


One minute - every hour - weekdays
(requires Windows Media Player)
newsflashr network
National Debt Clock

Calendar of Posts

Feed the Bull