<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Sell in May and go away: fact or fallacy?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/</link> <description>Prieur du Plessis’s international investment blog</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ever P</title><link>http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-29745</link> <dc:creator>Ever P</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 04:08:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/#comment-29745</guid> <description>It starting to look like the statistics will prove right in 2010. Thanks for the international charts. Here I thought it was just in the US where the markets take a nice vacation during the summer months.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It starting to look like the statistics will prove right in 2010. Thanks for the international charts. Here I thought it was just in the US where the markets take a nice vacation during the summer months.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Words from the (investment) wise May 3, 2009 &#124; The Big Picture</title><link>http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-11651</link> <dc:creator>Words from the (investment) wise May 3, 2009 &#124; The Big Picture</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 12:11:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/#comment-11651</guid> <description>[...] also see my recent posts &#8220;Video-o-rama: Investors &#8220;look past the valley&#8220;, &#8220;Sell in May and go away: Fact or fallacy?&#8221; and &#8220;Donald Coxe - Investment recommendations (April 2009)&#8221; (And also make a [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also see my recent posts &#8220;Video-o-rama: Investors &#8220;look past the valley&#8220;, &#8220;Sell in May and go away: Fact or fallacy?&#8221; and &#8220;Donald Coxe &#8211; Investment recommendations (April 2009)&#8221; (And also make a [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Blair</title><link>http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-11424</link> <dc:creator>David Blair</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 02:12:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/#comment-11424</guid> <description>The market calendar is just a piece of the puzzle.  As a trader I take the axioms for what they are worth axiom + axiom = axiom and if the axiom matches the charts then the higher the probability for a successful trade (short or long).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The market calendar is just a piece of the puzzle.  As a trader I take the axioms for what they are worth axiom + axiom = axiom and if the axiom matches the charts then the higher the probability for a successful trade (short or long).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Wallace</title><link>http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-11376</link> <dc:creator>David Wallace</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:37:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/#comment-11376</guid> <description>A lot of studies only look at the aggregate over time as support for the trading rule. It is important to look at the equity curve as well
to see if the rule has stopped working.Here is a table for the Profunds Ultra Bull fund (2x SP500): Jan 1998, Feb 2009.Period	Oct-Apr	May-Sep
1998	62.7%	-17.3%
1999	40.9%	-8.8%
2000	-19.9%	-4.0%
2001	10.0%	-37.2%
2002	3.9%	-52.6%
2003	32.1%	17.7%
2004	16.7%	1.9%
2005	-6.9%	11.6%
2006	20.3%	3.0%
2007	-1.6%	5.6%
2008	-49.1%	-23.5%
2009	-53.3%	0.0%
Total	55.6%	-103.6%Aggregate says be long Oct-Apr, be short May-Sep.
BUT not during bear markets.Did this rule stop working in 2003?Post 2000 bear, the May-Sep short was very rich.
A period similar to that one is coming up.BUT who wants to be short with all that stimulus $ hitting and with all the trillions in low-yield money market accounts waiting to come back, not me.So how do we really use this rule?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of studies only look at the aggregate over time as support for the trading rule. It is important to look at the equity curve as well<br
/> to see if the rule has stopped working.</p><p>Here is a table for the Profunds Ultra Bull fund (2x SP500): Jan 1998, Feb 2009.</p><p>Period	Oct-Apr	May-Sep<br
/> 1998	62.7%	-17.3%<br
/> 1999	40.9%	-8.8%<br
/> 2000	-19.9%	-4.0%<br
/> 2001	10.0%	-37.2%<br
/> 2002	3.9%	-52.6%<br
/> 2003	32.1%	17.7%<br
/> 2004	16.7%	1.9%<br
/> 2005	-6.9%	11.6%<br
/> 2006	20.3%	3.0%<br
/> 2007	-1.6%	5.6%<br
/> 2008	-49.1%	-23.5%<br
/> 2009	-53.3%	0.0%<br
/> Total	55.6%	-103.6%</p><p>Aggregate says be long Oct-Apr, be short May-Sep.<br
/> BUT not during bear markets.</p><p>Did this rule stop working in 2003?</p><p>Post 2000 bear, the May-Sep short was very rich.<br
/> A period similar to that one is coming up.</p><p>BUT who wants to be short with all that stimulus $ hitting and with all the trillions in low-yield money market accounts waiting to come back, not me.</p><p>So how do we really use this rule?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mr. Obvious</title><link>http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-11322</link> <dc:creator>Mr. Obvious</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:16:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/#comment-11322</guid> <description>I&#039;m probably not breaking any ground here, Prieur, but Ned Davis shows the results of the results of two hypothetical investment strategies.  The first is $10,000 invested just from May 1 - October 31; the second, from Nov. 1 - April 30.  Starting in 1950, the first strategy produces a net gain of $4,002; the second, $372,890.  I&#039;ll pay taxes on that any day.Using the same strategies but with the dates of May 1 - Sept. 30 and Oct. 1 - April 30, instead, the results are even more staggering.  Strategy 1 produces a gain of $2,684; the second $594,517.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m probably not breaking any ground here, Prieur, but Ned Davis shows the results of the results of two hypothetical investment strategies.  The first is $10,000 invested just from May 1 &#8211; October 31; the second, from Nov. 1 &#8211; April 30.  Starting in 1950, the first strategy produces a net gain of $4,002; the second, $372,890.  I&#8217;ll pay taxes on that any day.</p><p>Using the same strategies but with the dates of May 1 &#8211; Sept. 30 and Oct. 1 &#8211; April 30, instead, the results are even more staggering.  Strategy 1 produces a gain of $2,684; the second $594,517.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Guy Lerner</title><link>http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-11320</link> <dc:creator>Guy Lerner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:54:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2009/04/29/sell-in-may-and-go-away-fact-or-fallacy/#comment-11320</guid> <description>PdP:This is very well said on your part:&quot;Some you win, some you don’t! It seems that the axiom “sell in May and go away” in itself is a rather doubtful basis for timing equity investments. However, it may serve a useful purpose as input, together with other factors, to otherwise rational decision making.&quot;Probably can throw 95% of market analysis into that statement!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PdP:</p><p>This is very well said on your part:</p><p>&#8220;Some you win, some you don’t! It seems that the axiom “sell in May and go away” in itself is a rather doubtful basis for timing equity investments. However, it may serve a useful purpose as input, together with other factors, to otherwise rational decision making.&#8221;</p><p>Probably can throw 95% of market analysis into that statement!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.investmentpostcards.com @ 2012-02-12 02:24:27 by W3 Total Cache -->
