Words from the (investment) wise for the week that was (Oct 26 – Nov 1, 2009)
Rewind the movie to before the stock market lows of March 9: stocks down, corporate bonds down, commodities and gold down, emerging-market currencies down, safe havens in fashion, including the US dollar and government bonds. In short, risky assets closed sharply lower over the past few days as concerns mounted over the outlook for central bank policy and the sustainability of the global economic recovery, with investors only warming momentarily to the US emerging from recession as shown by the Q3 GDP report (announced on the 80th anniversary of Black Tuesday, October 29, 1929).
Cameron Brandt, senior analyst of fund tracker EPFR Global, said (via the Financial Times): “Good corporate earnings – viewed in recent weeks as fuel for a sustained recovery – are currently being regarded as ammunition for policymakers looking to close the fiscal and monetary stimulus taps.”
Adding to the economic uncertainty, Chuck Butler of the Daily Pfennig, highlighted a study by Peter Bernholz (Professor of Economics in Basel) in which he analyzed the world’s 12 most important periods of hyperinflation and discovered that the tipping point occurred when deficits amounted to 40% of the expenditures. “For the United States we have arrived at exactly that point. The deficit of $1.5 trillion amounts to 41.7% of the $3.6 trillion in expenses,” said Butler.
Source: Walt Handelsman, October 30, 2009.
The CBOE Volatility (VIX) Index is a measure of the implied volatility of S&P 500 Index options, with very low numbers indicating extreme bullishness and very high numbers severe bearishness. It is also referred to as the “fear gauge” of US stock markets and is used as a contrary indicator as it moves inversely to equity prices. As shown below, it is noteworthy that the VIX has surged by 48.3% during the past seven trading sessions to its highest level since early July.
The past week’s performance of the major asset classes is summarized by the chart below. The numbers indicate an all-change pattern in the performances from the past few months as risk aversion re-entered financial markets and investors moved money from stocks and commodities into government bonds and the US dollar.
A summary of the movements of major global stock markets for the past week, as well as since the October 19 peak and various other measurement periods, is given in the table below.
The MSCI World Index and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index declined by 4.1% and 5.5% respectively during the past week, resulting in the World Index being down 1.8% for the month of October and the Emerging Markets Index recording a zero return. As far as individual markets are concerned, Sweden and New Zealand were the only major markets closing the week in the black. However, a number of markets (mostly emerging) managed to see the month out with positive returns.
The US indices closed down for the second consecutive week, yo-yoing during the course of the week, but with a particularly ugly close (on steep volume) on Friday, marking the worst day in the case of the Dow Jones Industrial Index and the S&P 500 Index since the beginning of July. The benchmarks recorded their first loss-making month since February, with the exception of the Dow Jones Industrial Index that was unchanged from September.
Click here or on the table below for a larger image.
Top performers among stock markets this week were Ecuador (+4.2%), Sweden (+1.2%), Bangladesh (+1.2%), Kenya (+1.1%) and Uganda (+1.0%). At the bottom end of the performance rankings countries included Peru (‑9.5%), Ghana (-8.9%), Ireland (-8.9%), Cyprus (-7.9%) and Argentina (‑7.9%).
Of the 99 stock markets I keep on my radar screen, only 15% recorded gains, 84% showed losses and 1% remained unchanged. (Click here to access a complete list of global stock market movements, as supplied by Emerginvest.)
John Nyaradi (Wall Street Sector Selector) reports that, as far as exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are concerned, the winners for the week included ProShares Short Emerging Markets (EUM) (+7.7%), ProShares Short Russell 2000 (RWM) (+6.5%) and ProShares Short Financial (SEF) (+6.5%). Besides short funds, CurrencyShares Japanese Yen Trust (FXY) (+2.3%) and PowerShares DB US Dollar Bullish (UUP) (+1.2%) also performed well.
On the losing side of the slate, ETFs included SPDR S&P Emerging Europe (GUR) (-11.0%), Market Vectors Solar Energy (KWT) (-11.0%) and Claymore/MAC Global Solar Energy (TAN) (-10.9%).
Referring to the massive Wall Street bonuses, the quote du jour this week comes from Allan Sloan in The Washington Post (hat tip: The King Report). He said: “What do the record-high Wall Street bonuses have in common with the record-low yields for savers? Answer: They show yet another way that prudent people, especially those living on fixed incomes, are being cheated by the government’s bailout of the imprudent.
“Here’s the deal. The government is spending trillions to keep interest rates down to support the economy and prop up housing prices, and those low rates have inflicted collateral damage on savers’ incomes. ‘It’s a direct wealth transfer from savers and retirees to overly indebted borrowers,’ says Greg McBride, senior financial analyst at Bankrate.com.”
Other news is that the struggle to establish a government-backed healthcare plan in the US received new impetus on Thursday when the Democrats in the House of Representatives tabled an $894 billion bill that included a “consumer option”. Separately, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) closed nine more banks on Friday, bringing the tally of US bank failures in 2009 to 115 – the first year since 1992 that more than 100 banks have gone under.
Next, a quick textual analysis of my week’s reading. Although “bank” still features prominently, the key words have started taking on a more normal pattern compared with the crisis-related words that have dominated the tag cloud for many months.
The major moving-average levels for the benchmark US indices, the BRIC countries and South Africa (from where I am writing this report) are given in the table below. Most of the indices, including all the US indices, have fallen below their 50-day moving averages over the past few days, but all the indices are still holding above their respective 200-day moving averages. The 50-day lines are also above the 200-day lines in all instances.
The October lows are also given in the table. A break below these levels would indicate a reversal of the uptrend since March, i.e. reversing the progression of higher reaction lows. In fact, last week’s declines resulted in some indices – including the Dow Jones Transportation Index, the Russell 2000 Index and the Nasdaq Composite Index – already having fallen below these levels.
Not shown below, the Australian All Ordinaries Index has already broken through its 200-day moving average, albeit only marginally, with the 50-day average at the same level as the 200-day level.
Click here or on the table below for a larger image.
Below is a chart not many analysts follow, namely the Dow Jones Composite Average, made up of the 30 industrial stocks, the 20 transportation stocks and the 15 utility stocks. According to Richard Russell (Dow Theory Letters), the Composite tends to lead the market on many occasions. “Note that the Composite is trading completely below its 50-day moving average. The divergence with MACD at the bottom of the chart is spectacular. Volume is expanding as the Composite declines. In all, a nasty picture, and one that I take seriously,” said the old-timer.
According to Casey’s Daily Dispatch, State Street Global Markets has just released its Investor Confidence Index for October 2009, measuring investor confidence on a quantitative basis by analyzing the actual buying and selling patterns of institutional investors. The results indicate that the big money is starting to turn bearish. “Global investor confidence fell by 10.0 points to 108.4 from a revised September level of 118.4. The most pronounced decline was evident among North American investors, where confidence fell by 12.8 points from 113.9 to 101.1,” said the report.
Source: Cris Wood, Casey’s Daily Dispatch, October 30, 2009.
Breadth indicators are useful tools to assess the inner workings of the market’s rallies or corrections, and these indicators are used to identify strength or weakness behind market moves, i.e. to assess how the bulls and the bears are exerting themselves. Three of these measures are discussed below.
The advance/decline spread tracks the difference between advancing and declining issues and is widely used to measure the breadth of a stock market advance or decline. The chart below shows that the cumulative spread between declining and advancing issues on the Nasdaq turned down a few days prior to the October 19 peak and is leading the market lower.
Net new highs are calculated by subtracting the number of new 52-week lows from the number of new 52-week highs. March 6 marked an “internal bottom” when a large number of the stocks on the NYSE recorded new lows (whereas a “price bottom” was recorded on March 9). Net new highs have since improved markedly, but it would seem that the ratio is close to falling below the zero line (i.e. when new lows will again exceed new highs).
The number of NYSE stocks trading above their respective 50-day moving averages has dropped to 34.7% from 91.6% in September. In order to be bullish about the secondary trend, one would expect the majority of stocks to be above the 50-day line. For a primary uptrend to be intact, the bulk of the index constituents also need to trade above their 200-day averages. This is a slow indicator, with the number still at a lofty 85.9% but down from its recent peak of 93.4%.
Stock market breadth has been moving in the wrong direction over the past few days and the “internals” seem to indicate further downside.
A number of commentators have been making pronouncements about the extent of a possible decline. For example, Jeremy Grantham (GMO) expects the S&P 500 to drop by 15-25%, David Rosenberg (Gluskin Sheff & Associates) sees markets falling by 20%, Doug Kass is looking at -5% to ‑12%, David Fuller at 10-15% and Barry Ritholtz at 5-15% (The Big Picture), with Andrew Smithers (Smithers & Co) the most bearish, viewing the S&P 500 to be 40% overvalued.
Turning to fundamentals: as discussed in a post a few days ago, a good way of looking at valuation levels, and cutting through the uncertainty of having to forecast earnings, is by means of Robert Shiller‘s cyclically adjusted price-earnings ratio (CAPE), effectively muting the impact of the business cycle by averaging ten years of earnings. Using rolling ten-year reported earnings, my research (based on Shiller’s methodology, but including some refinements) shows that the “normalized” price-earnings ratio of the S&P 500 Index is currently 18.8. This compares with a long-term average of just more than 16.3 and implies an overvaluation of 13%. The graphs below show data since 1950, but the actual calculations date back to 1871.
From across the pond in London, David Fuller (Fullermoney) said: “In the short term, technical evidence suggests that we are now in a reaction and consolidation phase for most stock markets. Some of this is likely to be confined to primarily ranging patterns as we have already seen. For others, the mean reversion process towards rising 200-day moving averages is likely to include larger corrections than we have seen to date. At this stage of the stock market cycle, I regard mean reversion as a buying opportunity.”
I will bide my time while the fundamentals play catch-up. Meanwhile, caution remains the operative word.
For more discussion on the economy and financial markets, see my recent posts “Stocks and risky assets stumble“, “Stock markets – is uptrend still intact?“, “Picture du Jour: Stock market rally long in the tooth“, “Gross: Rally in risk assets at its pinnacle“, “Rosenberg: Stocks overvalued by 20%” and “Jeremy Grantham: Fair value on the S&P 500 is 860“. (And do make a point of listening to Donald Coxe’s webcast of October 30, which can be accessed from the sidebar of the Investment Postcards site.)
For short comments – maximum 140 characters – on topical economic and market issues, web links and graphs, you can also follow me on Twitter by clicking here.
Source: Dismal Scientist
“There has been no meaningful change in global business confidence in almost three months. Sentiment improved sharply this summer and is now consistent with a global economic recovery, but a very tentative and fragile one,” according to the results of the latest Survey of Business Confidence of the World by Moody’s Economy.com. “Businesses are most upbeat about equipment and software investment and the broader outlook into early next year, and most negative about the strength of their current sales and hiring. South Americans are the most positive, and North Americans generally the most negative.”
Source: Moody’s Economy.com
According to Li & Fung Research Centre, the Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) in China rose to 55.2% in October, up by 1.3 percentage points from the previous month. The Index has stayed in the expansionary zone of higher than 50% for eight consecutive months, indicating that the manufacturing sector in China has continued to improve steadily.
“Several countries, such as India, Australia, Norway, and Japan, have already begun exit strategies to drain excess liquidity used to stimulate their economies to counter the global recession. India’s lenders are keeping more cash in bonds and raising statutory liquidity ratios, Australia and Norway have already hiked interest rates, and Japan has said it will stop buying corporate debt by year-end,” reported US Global Funds in its latest Weekly Investor Alert.
A snapshot of the week’s US economic reports is provided below. (Click on the dates to see Northern Trust‘s assessment of the various data releases.)
Friday, October 30
Thursday, October 29
Wednesday, October 28
Tuesday, October 27
Monday, October 26
Commenting on the US GDP annual growth rate of 3.5%, John Williams (Shadow Government Statistics, courtesy of The King Report) warned that one-time stimulus or inventory items represented 92% of the reported growth.
Many people who planned to buy a car in Q4 probably took advantage of “cash for clunkers” and bought in Q3. “To put this into GDP terms, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) the spike you see in the chart below added 1.66% to the US GDP growth figure. Thus without it, GDP growth would have been only 1.89% (3.5-1.66%) in Q3,” reported Clusterstock.
Source: Clusterstock – Business Insider, October 29, 2009.
Commenting on the US growth outlook, Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust) said: “Going forward, the lift to the headline GDP number in the third quarter is partly from future auto sales, which implies that consumer spending and GDP growth are most likely to show more muted growth in the fourth quarter of 2009 and first quarter of 2010. The Fed is on hold for several months until it is confirmed the unemployment rate has peaked.”
According to MoneyNews, bond guru Bill Gross of Pimco said the Federal Reserve would not “risk raising rates” until the US has had a year-and-a-half of sustained economic growth, at a solid 4% rate.
Meanwhile, Richard Koo, chief economist at the Nomura Research Institute, warned (via MoneyNews) that the United States may go through a “lost decade” of stagnant economic growth similar to Japan’s experience in the 1990s if Washington yanks stimulus money out of the economy too soon. “We still need more government spending,” he said, adding that it could take “three to five years to get out of this mess, even under the best of circumstances.”
Source: Yahoo Finance, October 30, 2009.
Click here for a summary of Wells Fargo Securities’ weekly economic and financial commentary.
Next week sees interest rate announcements by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) (Wednesday, November 4), the European Central Bank (ECB) (Thursday, November 5) and the Bank of England (BoE) (Thursday, November 5). In addition, US economic data reports for the week include the following:
Monday, November 2
Tuesday, November 3
Wednesday, November 4
Thursday, November 5
Friday, November 6
Source: Wall Street Journal Online, October 30, 2009.
“Mistakes are a fact of life. It is the response to the error that counts,” said Nikki Giovanni, American poet, author and activist. Let’s hope the news items and quotes from market commentators included in the “Words from the Wise” review will assist readers of Investment Postcards to formulate appropriate strategies to recover from mishaps that are bound to happen from time to time.
Wishing all my readers a Happy Halloween!
That’s the way it looks from Cape Town (where the early-summer weather is unbeatable).
Source: Pat Bagley, Salt Lake Tribune
Financial Times: Transcript – George Soros interview
FT: Thank you for joining us, Mr Soros.
GS: It’s a pleasure.
FT: How do you judge the state of the world economy? Has the world recovered from the crisis of 2007/2008?
GS: Well, certainly the financial markets have regained their composure so they’re beginning to function again, and also the world economy has overcome the shock that it has suffered because for a while everything froze and now things are moving again. So there is rebound, but I think that the facts of the crisis will take a long time for the world to absorb and the main source of the problem is in the United States. This is where consumers have spent more than they earned for a period of 25 years; where we have accumulated current account deficit that reached 6.5 per cent at its peak, which actually could have continued because there were other countries – particularly China and the Asian tigers – that were very happy to run a continuous surplus and to finance our deficit. So that could have actually continued, but the households became over-indebted and it’s the consumer who accounts for over 70 per cent of the US economy that has to cut down, and that will take a while.
Then also you’ve got the banking system that basically was bankrupted. It’s at the bottom and has to earn its way out of a hole and, again, it’s happening at a pretty fast clip because banks borrow at zero and buy 10-year government bonds, yielding 3.5 per cent, and that’s a pretty fast rate of earnings for no risk. So, they’ll earn their way out of a hole, but it will also take time. And then there’s still the whole area of commercial real estate, where the losses have not been recognised. So the source of weakness in the world will be mainly in the US consumer spending and in, let’s say, the decline in the banking sector.
FT: And is that weakness in the US sufficiently grave that there could be a W-shaped recovery, that there could be another dip downwards?
GS: Well, I think certainly there could be another dip in the stock market because, right now we are enjoying the confidence multiplier and there’s a sort of a hope that this is a crisis like the previous ones and we will just sort of recover in a V-shape recovery. So, when that hope is not fulfilled, I think that will be …
FT: Which you are certain it will not be fulfilled?
GS: Well, I can’t see it being fulfilled. I may be wrong. I’ve been wrong before, but I just don’t see where the growth in the US economy can come from.
FT: Given this continued weakness in the US economy, are people right to start to be concerned about the dollar?
GS: Well, they are of course and the dollar is a very weak currency except for all the others. So there is a general lack of confidence in currencies and a move away from currencies into real assets. The Chinese are continuing to run a big trade surplus and they’re still accumulating assets and basically the renminbi is permanently undervalued because it’s tied to the dollar. There is a diversification from assets that are normally held by central banks into other assets, especially in the area of commodities. So there is a push in gold, there’s a strength in oil, and that is in a way a flight from currencies.
FT: Is there going to be a tipping point, a moment at which the dollar is fatally weakened? Or does it just sort of carry on?
GS: As long as the renminbi is tied to the dollar, I don’t see how the decline in the dollar can go too far. Now, of course, to some extent it’s very helpful because with the US consumers saving more and spending less, exports can be way for the US economy to be balanced. So, an orderly decline of the dollar is actually desirable.”
Click here for the full interview.
Source: Financial Times, October 23, 2009.
Forbes: Roubini – are capital controls in fashion again?
“The imposition of capital controls on capital inflows as well as currency intervention tends to be ineffective in reversing the appreciating trend of the local currencies, especially if the latter are primarily driven by external factors. However, capital controls may be helpful in easing volatility and the pace of the trend itself. The risk is that capital controls are seen as punitive measures against capital markets. They raise uncertainty about future policy actions, hurt the credibility of the central bank and increase the costs of external funding for local businesses. Overall, policymakers’ actions to contain the appreciating trend of their countries’ currencies depend on how fast capital is flowing in, sterilization costs, and monetary policy flexibility. Consequently, EM countries where currencies and equity markets have surged over the course of the year are the most likely to impose some sort of limitations on capital inflows.
“Capital controls alone may not be enough.
“It is important to recognize that the use of capital controls is not uniform and neither are the results. In addition, their impact can be subdued by global conditions. In today’s economy, EM currencies are up against a weakening dollar. The dollar is down 6.3% YTD and 14.3% from its March peak. The EM currency rally this year is even stronger than that of the US Dollar Index, with five different currencies gaining over 10% YTD. Only the Argentine peso has posted a significant loss against the dollar YTD.
“Governments are best served implementing measures aimed at smoothing currency appreciation as opposed to halting or reversing trends. This can be done in part by identifying and targeting areas of volatility and hence vulnerability. By addressing areas of greater volatility, countries can smooth currency flows without endangering macroeconomic stability. The recent tax in Brazil targets volatile portfolio flows as opposed to FDI. Portfolio investments fled Brazil following the Lehman collapse only to flow back this year. Meanwhile, FDI has remained relatively stable.
“Given the extraordinary flow into emerging markets, it is unlikely that capital controls or intervention alone will be able to put the brakes on EM currency appreciation. Indeed, the Brazilian real gave up 3% against the dollar following the announcement of the tax before appreciating 3.7% after four days. That said, Brazil and other governments may find themselves in a position where they need to tap a greater arsenal if their desire to stem appreciation is strong. With that in mind, look for central bank intervention to be a greater theme in the coming months.”
Click here for the full article.
Source: Nouriel Roubini, Forbes, October 29, 2009.
MoneyNews: Krugman – China simply stealing jobs
“‘China has been keeping its currency pegged to the dollar – which means that a country with a huge trade surplus and a rapidly recovering economy, a country whose currency should be rising in value, is in effect engineering a large devaluation instead,’ writes Krugman in The New York Times.
“China is creating a bubble for its own economy. Krugman says this policy is particularly precarious during a period when the world economy remains deeply depressed due to dampened demand.
“‘By pursuing a weak-currency policy, China is siphoning some of that inadequate demand away from other nations, which is hurting growth almost everywhere,’ writes Krugman.
“‘The biggest victims, by the way, are probably workers in other poor countries. In normal times, I’d be among the first to reject claims that China is stealing other peoples’ jobs, but right now it’s the simple truth.’
“The US government has been excessively tepid in addressing this issue.
“Last week, the Treasury Department testified in a required report to Congress that China is not manipulating its currency.
“‘They’re kidding, right?’ writes Krugman. ‘The thing is, right now this caution makes little sense.'”
Source: Gene Koprowski, MoneyNews, October 28, 2009.
Financial Times: Eurozone lending to private sector declines
“September’s eurozone credit numbers indicated lending had been scaled back at an unprecedented pace, strengthening the case for the European Central Bank to maintain its ultra-loose interest rate policy.
“Loans to the private sector contracted at an annual rate of 0.3%, after a 0.1% rise in August, according to the ECB. That was the first time the annual growth rate had turned negative since comparable statistics began in 1992. The euro was launched in 1999.
“Although the data showed signs of a pick-up in lending to households in September compared with August, they could fuel policymakers’ fears that a weakened banking sector will fail to provide business with the credit needed to reboot the economy.
“‘A lack of credit growth could certainly undermine the pace of recovery,’ said Colin Ellis, European economist at Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe. Unlike the UK, the eurozone is thought by economists to have expanded in the third quarter compared with the previous three months, marking the formal end of its recession.
“‘To get a fully fledged business cycle upswing emerging, you need to see credit taking off – but that normally takes one or two years,’ said Julian Callow, European economist at Barclays Capital.
“But Mr Callow argued that the latest data might have been distorted downwards by banks securitising loans, which would have removed them from the ECB’s statistics even though the credit was still available to the economy.”
Source: Ralph Atkins, Financial Times, October 27, 2009.
MoneyNews: Koo – US risks Japan-style lost decade
“‘This isn’t a cold. It’s more like pneumonia,’ Koo told Bloomberg News.
“‘We still need more government spending,’ adding it could take ‘three to five years to get out of this mess, even under the best of circumstances.’
“Koo and other noted economists such as Nobel laureate Paul Krugman believe US economic recovery expected for the latter half of this year will be short-lived if the Obama administration withdraws stimulus money.
“The administration is belatedly trying to narrow a record $1.4 trillion budget deficit and thus boost the sagging dollar.
“As an example, Koo says, look to Japan, where an asset bubble burst in 1990 and left companies repaying debt instead of taking on new projects that would have refueled economic growth via continued stimulus.
“‘When we see the private sector coming to borrow again, I’ll be the loudest person on earth arguing for fiscal reform. That’s the exit,’ says Koo.
“Nevertheless, White House Officials say stimulus spending has already kick-started the economy and will do little to help out next year.
“‘By mid-2010, fiscal stimulus will likely be contributing little to further growth,’ says Christina Romer, the chair of President Barack Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, according to the Associated Press.”
Source: Forrest Jones, MoneyNews, October 26, 2009.
Bespoke: Is the NBER gearing up for a big announcement?
Source: Bespoke, October 26, 2009.
Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Recession is history, economy back in business
“The Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research will make the official announcement after it confirms the turning point based on revisions of economic data. This recession is the longest on record in the post-war period and the deepest also. Real GDP has declined 3.8% from the peak in the second quarter of 2008 to the trough in the second quarter of 2009. This is the largest peak-to-trough decline of real GDP in the post-war period
“In the third quarter, consumer spending accounted for the largest part of the growth in real GDP, followed by exports, inventories and residential investment expenditures. Of these four components, exports and inventories are most likely to continue to make large contributions in the quarters ahead. Consumer spending is projected to advance in the quarters ahead but at a noticeably slower pace. The surge in auto sales from the ‘cash for clunkers’ program in the third quarter provided the temporary lift to consumer spending.
“Going forward, the lift to the headline GDP number in the third quarter is partly from future auto sales, which implies that consumer spending and GDP growth are most likely to show more muted growth in the fourth quarter of 2009 and first quarter of 2010. The Fed is hold for several months until it is confirmed the unemployment rate has peaked.”
Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, October 29, 2009.
Financial Times: US economy grows
Click here or on the image below to view the video clip.
Click here for the full article.
Source: Financial Times, October 29, 2009.
Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Consumer spending – mild increase in Q4
“Effectively, expenditures on cars accounted for a large part of the strong increase in real consumer spending in the third quarter. The question now is if the absence of rebates for cars will prevent an increase in overall consumer spending in the fourth quarter. The nature of consumer spending data for the last month of quarter helps to confirm or revise forecasts of the following quarter. However, the September estimate of real consumer spending ($9261.1 billion) is barely different from the third quarter average ($9265.2 billion). Based on the small negative bias and possibility of revisions, consumer spending is likely to show only a moderate increase in the fourth quarter of 2009 after a 3.4% jump in third quarter.”
Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, October 30, 2009.
MoneyNews: Bill Gross – no Fed hikes for a while
“Consider this in light of the fact that he and his colleagues at the money management giant have long said that US growth is about to engage in a long period of a ‘new normal’ where growth rates are much lower, perhaps under 2%.
“‘Nominal GDP must show realistic signs of stabilizing near 4% before the Fed would be willing to risk raising rates. The current embedded cost of US debt markets is close to 6% and nominal GDP must grow within reach of that level if policymakers are to avoid continuing debt deflation in corporate and household balance sheets,’ writes Gross in his monthly economic forecast.
“The US economy will likely approach 4% nominal growth as early as 2009’s final quarter, says Gross. But, the ability to sustain those levels once inventory rebalancing and fiscal pump-priming effects wear off is ‘debatable’, he says.
“‘The Fed will likely require 12 to 18 months of 4% plus nominal growth before abandoning the zero percent benchmark,’ writes Gross.
The “negative wealth effect” caused by last year’s stock market crash must be ameliorated to reintegrate the private sector into the Wall Street economy, the investment guru adds.”
Source: Gene Koprowski, MoneyNews, October 29, 2009.
Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Chicago National Activity Index – more validation about economic recovery
Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, October 26, 2009.
Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Durable goods orders – mixed performance in third quarter
Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, October 28, 2009.
Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Total continuing claims are stabilizing
“Upon the completion of 26 weeks, recipients can collect unemployment insurance under the Extended Benefits Program and Emergency Unemployment Compensation Program. Therefore, the true size of recipient of unemployment insurance is a sum total of recipients under these various programs. Data for the special programs lags initial jobless claims data by two weeks. During the week ended October 10, total continuing claims inclusive of seasonally adjusted continuing claims and those under the special programs dropped to 9.84 million from a revised peak of 10 million during the week ended October 3. This decline is noteworthy because it the first positive sign in the labor market after several weeks. We should be able to confirm the improvement as additional data become available.”
Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, October 29, 2009.
Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Consumer confidence slips in October, job situation is main driver
“Consumers continue to view the labor market in unfavorable light. The number of respondents indicating that ‘jobs are hard to get’ rose (47.6 vs. 47.0 in September) while those responding ‘jobs are plentiful’ declined (3.4 vs. 3.6 in September). The net of these two indices moved up in October to 46.2 from 43.4 in September. Historically, there is a strong positive relationship between the net of the indexes about the job market and the unemployment rate. The latest information about a pessimistic perception of the labor market implies that a higher unemployment rate is likely in October. This confirms widely projected information.”
Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, October 27, 2009.
Asha Bangalore (Northern Trust): Sales of new homes decline, but inventories and prices remain favorable
“It appears that existing homes inclusive of distressed properties were more attractive for new homeowners compared with new single-family homes in September. Sales of existing homes increased 9.4% in September. The combined sales of new and existing single-family homes have risen in six out of the last nine months and are about 21% above the cycle low seen in January 2009.
“Inventories of unsold new single-family homes have declined from a peak of 12.4-month supply in January 2009 to 7.5-months in the August-September period. The inventory-sales ratio was unchanged at the 7.5-month mark in September. The historical median of inventory of unsold new single-family homes is a 6-month supply.
“The median price of a new single-family home fell 9.1% from a year ago to $204,800 in September, representing a noticeable deceleration in the pace of price declines. Additional reductions in price, but at a slower pace are likely, given the large number of homes that are unsold. There will be setbacks and gains in the housing sector but the net result should be positive in the months ahead.”
Source: Asha Bangalore, Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, October 28, 2009.
Standard & Poor’s: Case-Shiller – home prices continue to improve
“The chart above depicts the annual returns of the 10-City and 20-City Composite Home Price Indices, declining 10.6% and 11.3%, respectively, in August compared to the same month last year. Nineteen of the 20 metro areas and both Composites showed an improvement in the annual rates of decline with August’s readings compared to July.
“‘Broadly speaking, the rate of annual decline in home price values continues to improve’ says David Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at Standard & Poor’s. ‘The two Composites and 19 of the 20 metro areas showed an improvement in the annual rates of return, as seen through a moderation in their annual declines. Looking at the monthly data, 17 of the MSAs and both Composites saw price increases in August over July. While many of the markets remain down versus this time last year, the relative rate of decline has shown some real improvement.”
Source: Standard & Poor’s, October 27, 2009.
The Wall Street Journal: Gloom spreads on economy, but GOP doesn’t gain
“The survey found a country in a decidedly negative mood, nearly a year after the election of President Barack Obama. For the first time during the Obama presidency, a majority of Americans sees the country as being on the wrong track.
“Fifty-eight percent of those polled say the economic slide still has a ways to go, up from 52% in September and back to the level of pessimism expressed in July. Only 29% said the economy had ‘pretty much hit bottom’, down from 35% last month.
“But a dark national view of how everybody in Washington is conducting the public’s business appears to be preventing Republicans from benefiting from concerns about the direction of the country or the Democrat-led government’s handling of the economy, as the minority party often does.
“In fact, disapproval of the Republican Party actually has ticked upward, along with the public’s general pessimism. Asked which political party should control Congress after next year’s midterm elections, Democrats now hold a clear edge over the GOP, 46% to 38%, a month after the Republicans were nearly as popular. In September, the Democratic edge was 43% to 40%.
“‘There was a bounce-back surge for Republicans, and that’s stalled,’ said Bill McInturff, a Republican pollster who conducted the Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll with Democratic pollster Peter Hart.
“‘The mood in America may be blue, but attitudes toward Washington are just jet black,’ Mr. Hart said.”
Source: Jonathan Weisman, The Wall Street Journal, October 28, 2009.
The Wall Street Journal: Geithner testifies on regulation
Source: The Wall Street Journal, October 29, 2009.
Financial Times: Draft law would extend Fed powers
“The landmark bill drawn up by the Treasury and the House financial services committee sets up a council of regulators charged with snuffing out systemic risks and gives the government and the Fed sweeping powers over financial companies at home and overseas.
“The Fed would require systemically significant companies – including foreign groups that own a large or risky US subsidiary – to abide by ‘heightened prudential standards’. These include leverage limits, liquidity rules and the drafting of a resolution plan, or ‘living will’.
“Companies would be placed in the new category if the council deemed that ‘material financial distress at the company could pose a threat to financial stability or the economy’.
“But the draft law goes further than expected – allowing the Fed to require any systemically significant company to ‘sell or otherwise transfer assets or off-balance sheet items to unaffiliated firms, to terminate one or more activities, or to impose conditions on the manner in which the identified financial holding company conducts one or more activities’.
“If that does not save a company, the government could seize it and force rival banks that have more than $10 billion in assets to repay any taxpayer money used to seize or wind up their competitor.”
Source: Tom Braithwaite, Saskia Scholtes, Aline van Duyn and Francesco Guerrera, Financial Times, October 28, 2009.
Financial Times: Fed chief warns banks on capital
“In a speech to the Boston Fed, Mr Bernanke said the capital raisings that followed the bank ‘stress tests’ were important, but needed to go further to help prevent future failures.
“Tier one common equity ratios increased to 7.5% at the end of June this year from 5.3% at the end of last year.
“‘Options under consideration include assessing a capital surcharge on these institutions or requiring that a greater share of their capital be in the form of common equity,’ he said.
“Institutions whose collapse could threaten the entire system would be forced to go even further, possibly being required to issue contingent capital – hybrid securities that convert from debt to common equity at times of financial stress.
“Economists who advocate the introduction of the requirement believe it would help, not only by reinforcing the capital base for when a bank gets in trouble, but also as it would prompt holders of the securities – who want to avoid conversion – to exert pressure on executives to avoid risky behaviour.
“Increased capital requirements look likely to be one of the few elements of the Obama administration’s regulatory reform plan to survive unscathed after the industry’s huge lobbying effort and wrangling in Congress.”
Source: Tom Braithwaite, Financial Times, October 23, 2009.
Financial Times: Why sovereign bond yields will explode
“It will not be business as usual for government bond prices. That is because current bond yields and the increasing insolvency of our rulers are the biggest disconnect in financial markets today. This comes from two factors: quantitative easing by central banks and the collapse of credit demand by the private sector. Neither are permanent features of the economic landscape.
v”Some will note that, when Japan’s bubble economy collapsed, it was able to run huge budget deficits and raise outstanding government debt from 60% to 140% of gross domestic product, while still experiencing a fall in bond yields from 8% to 1%.
“But this ‘miracle’ was only possible because Japan’s household savings were huge and invested at home. Japan did not need foreigners to fund its government deficits. Even today, foreign ownership of Japanese debt is only 6% compared with 50% for US government paper.
“But Japan’s household savings rate has collapsed due to an ageing population who no longer save. This low saving rate is something death must undo, not the politicians or monetary policy. So, if Japan is now running budget deficits at double- digit percentage rates of GDP, it can no longer use low-cost excess domestic savings to do so.
v”The Japanese ‘miracle’ of the 1990s cannot be repeated in the US, the UK or even in Japan this time. The US and the UK will still have very low domestic savings rates with government debt heading towards 100 per cent of GDP. Neither is likely to suffer from prolonged deflation as Japan did. And both the US and the UK are heavily dependent on foreigners for financing that debt. So Treasury and gilt yields will rise sharply and the dollar and the pound will slide.”
Source: David Roche, Financial Times, October 26, 2009.
Reuters: PIMCO’s Gross – Fed programs end may pressure debt
“Asked about the risk that a recovering US economy hurts Treasury investors, he said ‘there’s not a heightened sense of concern, but there is some concern’.
v”‘It’s obvious that the programs in the United States, the Federal Reserve buyback programs … those purchases and that purchasing power will cease within the next three to four months,’ Gross told a Canadian business television channel.
“‘So, to the extent that that’s gone, then perhaps the upward influence in terms of those longer-term Treasuries will be felt more strongly in the next several quarters.'”
Source: Jeffrey Hodgson, Reuters, October 26, 2009.
Richard Russell (Dow Theory Letters): Two possibilities for stock markets
“(1) The primary trend of the stock market and the economy remains bearish. The advance from the March lows represents a correction or a rally in the bear market. The rally now appears to be in trouble. In fact, the rally may now be in the process of topping out. If this is indeed a rally in a continuing bear market, then in due time the Dow and the majority of stocks will decline and violate their March lows. If both the Industrials and Transports violate their March lows, it will be a signal that the primary bear market has been reconfirmed. However, if both Averages decline, and then rise to new highs, this will be a very bullish indication. It will be a sign that I have been wrong, and that we are probably in a bull market.
“(2) This is the second possible scenario. A bull market started from the March lows, and the advance from the March lows was the first leg of a new bull market. The first leg of the new bull market may now be in the process of topping out. If so, we will have to monitor the decline very carefully. If the decline develops into a secondary reaction and then halts, what comes next is crucial. Following the decline, if both Averages then head higher and break out to new highs, we will know that we are in a new bull market.
“I might add that either way, if the market now declines substantially, I think it will have the effect of turning investors and consumer sentiment even more fearful than it presently is. In which case, consumers will cut back even more on their buying and at the same time boost their desire to save and reduce their debts.
“Admittedly, the first scenario would be a disaster. The disaster would be if the entire advance from the March low were to be wiped out. That would mean that we’ve been in a primary bear market all along, and that the advance from the March low was simply an upward correction in an ongoing bear market. If so, then it’s just a matter of time before the Dow and a majority of stocks break below the March lows, in which case the bear market would be in full force again.
“If the first scenario comes to pass, this would be a disaster, but we must deal what the market gives us. A violation of the March lows by both Industrials and Transports would mean that really hard times lie ahead and that deflation will dominate the US and probably the rest of the world. Furthermore, it would mean that all the trillions that the Obama administration has spent have gone for naught.”
Source: Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, October 29, 2009.
David Fuller (Fullermoney): Stocks to correct by 10-15%
“At this stage of the bull cycle, I think a correction of approximately 10-15% for developed country stock markets and somewhat more for emerging markets would be good news for investors with cash to invest. Such a mean reversion towards rising 200-day moving averages would blow the recent froth off valuations and stem talk of an early change in monetary policy.
“Equities could then benefit from a second wind for the rally created by what should be good year-on-year comparative figures for GDP and corporate profits during 4Q 2009 and 1Q 2010. Conversely, if stock markets were to surprise us and extend their upward trends in early November, they would be discounting a bullish outlook for the next two quarters, leaving markets more susceptible to profit taking during the next round of favourable economic news.
“Meanwhile, very clear upward dynamics and follow through, similar to what we saw in the second half of July, are now required to check the current reactions / corrections.”
Source: David Fuller, Fullermoney, October 28, 2009.
MoneyNews: Smithers – S&P 500 40% overvalued
“Banks will probably sell more shares to raise the cash they need and drag down the index, said Andrew Smithers, economist and president of research company Smithers & Co., in an interview with Bloomberg.
“‘Markets are very vulnerable to an end of quantitative easing,’ said Smithers.
“‘Central banks, they’ve got to stop (buying) some time and if that happens everything will come down.’
“Smithers presciently warned investors off stocks in 2000 at the beginning of a bear market that growled on for two years.
“The heavy infusions of cash into credit markets by the Fed, the Bank of England, and other central banks around the world to save the collapsing financial system may soon stop, Smithers points out.
“Central bank purchases of debt and troubled assets may have worked short term, Smithers suggests.
“But now, as purchases have slowed and may stop altogether, he’s raising a red flag.
“‘Quantitative easing has set off another sharp, and so far containable, asset bubble,’ he said.
“‘But if it gets too high and starts to come down then we’ll go straight back (into recession).'”
Source: Marc Davis, MoneyNews, October 26, 2009.
Barry Ritholtz (The Big Picture): Rally getting tired?
“Given the recent market action, I am now starting to pull in my horns a bit, as this rally looks to be getting a little tired and showing signs of technical deterioration.
“We may yet see a new high in this move off of the lows (though that is not guaranteed). However, I see a significant increase in the odds for a fairly substantial correction – in the 5-15% range – over the next 60 days.
“5 factors are making me more cautious:
1) Over the past four days, we have had three failed rallies;
2) The number of new highs on the major indices is contracting;
3) Stocks seem to be reacting far less enthusiastically to earnings beats then they had been;
4) The Transports have been acting squirrelly lately;
5) The S&P is forming an ascending wedge.
“Note: This is not a major call, it looks to me like more of a minor reversal. (Sometimes, those can evolve into something more serious). The reason I expect it to remain modest/contained is the ongoing stimulus to the markets of zero percent interest rates …”
Source: Barry Ritholtz, The Big Picture, October 27, 2009.
MoneyNews: Morgan Stanley – this rally almost over
“The tightening phase may start in the next quarter or two, Draaisma observes.
“‘We believe investors need increasingly to consider the implications of monetary and fiscal stimulus withdrawal,’ he says.
“‘We expect the first Fed rate hike in mid-2010, but the tightening turning point could come sooner, for instance through higher oil.’
“‘The Fed language change ahead of the first hike, or a market timing sell signal, would indicate the start of that next phase, for us.’
“Draaisma says the start of tightening phases tends to lead to some indigestion and a defensive rotation in equity markets, for two quarters or more.”
Source: Julie Crawshaw, MoneyNews, October 26, 2009.
Bespoke: Earnings trends
“Just like a balance sheet, the ‘beat’ rate gives you a snapshot of where things stand at a single point in time, but it’s the trend in this number that really matters. Right now, the fact that the ‘beat’ rate is high relative to other quarters isn’t as important as the downtrend of the ‘beat’ rate throughout the current earnings season, and this is probably one reason that the market has been struggling.”
Source: Bespoke, October 29, 2009.
Bespoke: Percentage of stocks above 50-Day moving averages falls sharply
“The percentage of stocks above their 50-days in the Materials sector has fallen the most, from nearly 100% above all the way down to just 17%. Financials and Technology have taken big hits as well. Energy and Consumer Staples both still have more than 70% of stocks above their 50-days, so they’ve held up the best on the recent declines.”
Source: Bespoke, October 28, 2009.
BCA Research: Dollar breakdown = “go-global” theme breakout
“While domestic demand is slowly reviving, global growth is already rebounding much faster, underpinned by the sharp recovery in emerging market economies (especially China). This trend should persist, as the deleveraging process continues in the US, while fully functioning financial systems in the emerging world foster renewed credit extension.
“The depreciating dollar represents another boon for globally-geared companies. A weakening U.S dollar is bullish for globally-sourced revenues as it cheapens prices for foreign buyers and boosts currency translation effects. Indeed, the trade-weighted dollar has a decent track record in leading relative corporate profitability, and the current message is positive.
“Bottom line: Continue to favor global over domestic stocks, given that relative profit drivers and valuations remain overwhelmingly in favor of globally-geared equities.”
Source: BCA Research, October 26, 2009.
Bloomberg: Roubini says carry trades fueling “huge” asset bubble
“‘We have the mother of all carry trades,’ Roubini, who predicted the banking crisis that spurred more than $1.6 trillion of asset writedowns and credit losses at financial companies worldwide since 2007, said via satellite to a conference in Cape Town, South Africa. ‘Everybody’s playing the same game and this game is becoming dangerous.’
“The dollar has dropped 12% in the past year against a basket of six major currencies as the Federal Reserve, led by Chairman Ben Bernanke, cut interest rates to near zero in an effort to lift the US economy out of its worst recession since the 1930s. Roubini said the dollar will eventually ‘bottom out’ as the Fed raises borrowing costs and withdraws stimulus measures including purchases of government debt. That may force investors to reverse carry trades and ‘rush to the exit’, he said.
“‘The risk is that we are planting the seeds of the next financial crisis,’ said Roubini, chairman of New York-based research and advisory service Roubini Global Economics. ‘This asset bubble is totally inconsistent with a weaker recovery of economic and financial fundamentals.'”
Source: Michael Patterson, Bloomberg, October 27, 2009.
MoneyNews: Faber – in a decade, dollar will fall to zero
“Faber, publisher of the Gloom Boom & Doom Report, told Bloomberg, ‘It will go to a value of exactly zero eventually, but not right now.’
“The dollar will drift for a while, with occasional rebounds, Faber says.
“‘The other currencies aren’t much better either. They are also paper currencies. But I think that against gold, it will continue to depreciate.’
“And when can we expect the dollar to be worthless?
“‘Looking at Mr. Obama and his administration, it should already be there,’ Faber says.
“‘But I think it will take roughly 10 years until people really realize that the fiscal position of the US is a complete disaster.’
“Faber maintains that in about 10 years, 50% of US tax revenue will be used just to cover interest payments on the government debt.
“‘That is unsustainable,’ he says. ‘Then you really are forced to print money.'”
Source: Dan Weil, MoneyNews, October 29, 2009.
Financial Times: Don’t write off the dollar
“First, he says, as long as floors remain in housing and consumer confidence, the US economic recovery is sustainable. ‘Confidence eased slightly in October but remains above its recent low,’ he notes.
“Second, he believes the saving/investment equation is not yet sufficiently imbalanced to suggest a dollar crisis is imminent.
“Furthermore, the debt-to-GDP ratio remains below the 100% level typically considered problematic. ‘While there has been some talk of an eventual US debt downgrade, the timeframe still appears to be several years away.’
“Mr Rissmiller also argues the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates, while employing tools such as paying interest on reserves, leaving its balance sheet elevated. ‘There’s a lot of room for tighter US monetary policy before policy becomes ‘tight’,’ he says.
“Also, foreign central banks could intervene in support of the dollar, given the global push for exports as a solution to the economic downturn.
“Finally, pegged and semi-pegged currency countries, such as China, have little incentive to disrupt the current trade system. ‘Without inflation in developing Asia, there’s little need to make drastic changes now,’ he says.”
Source: Donald Rissmiller, Financial Times, October 29, 2009.
CNBC: Bottom in for the dollar?
Source: CNBC, October 23, 2009.
Mineweb: China sovereign wealth fund speeding up investment – mining a target
“China’s People’s Daily reports CIC chairman Lou Jiwei as saying that the fund was circumspect in its investment in 2008 as markets plunged investing only $4.8 billion outside China that year, but this year it has been investing around as much each month overseas as it did in the whole of 2008 with the main targets including mining, energy and real estate.
“While the principal purpose of the Fund is to create wealth for the country with its huge dollar surpluses there does also seem to be a dual approach in play, particularly with regard to the mining and energy sectors where an element of securing long term supplies for China’s ever-growing industrial sector has to be an important factor.
“However as we have reported here beforehand, CIC, as well as various state-owned minerals sector companies, seem to be pushed by the Chinese government to work day and night to divest as much as possible in its surplus dollars in solid assets beneficial to the nation, as it sees the value of the US dollar declining almost daily.
“The purchasing power of CIC is huge. At the end of 2008 some 87.4% of its overseas investments were held in cash and cash equivalents. There have also been indications that the Chinese government is prepared to pump more funding into CIC should it be needed.”
Source: Lawrence Williams, Mineweb, October 23, 2009.
Financial Times: Oil could exceed $100 next year
“Demand in emerging markets is coming back with a vengeance, led by China, and will lend tremendous support to the global oil market in 2010.
“Mr Blanch notes that, with Brent trading around $79 a barrel, oil currently sits at a 47% discount to its record high and is lagging behind most other real and financial assets in the recovery.
“‘A spike in oil prices above the $100-a-barrel level could create significant headwinds for the global economy,’ he adds, warning that a sharp increase could also lead to a repetition of last year’s price collapse.
“In spite of the weakening dollar and increased liquidity, he says the risk of a spike in the near term is low – ‘physical fundamentals are simply not very supportive of higher oil prices’. In the US, Merrill notes demand seems to be improving but only relative to the dismal levels registered after Lehman Brothers’ collapse last October.
“The other side of the Atlantic is not faring much better. ‘The reality is that petroleum demand in Europe remains in the doldrums,’ says Mr Blanch. That should change next year.”
Source: Francisco Blanch, Financial Times, October 26, 2009.
Financial Times: Saudis drop WTI oil contract
“The decision by the world’s biggest oil exporter could encourage other producers to abandon the benchmark and threatens the dominance of the world’s most heavily traded oil futures contract. It is the main contract traded on Nymex.
“The move reveals the growing discontent of Riyadh and its US refinery customers with WTI after the price of the price of the benchmark became separated from the global oil market this year.
“The surge in oil inventories in Cushing, Oklahoma, where WTI is delivered into America’s pipeline system, depressed the value of the WTI against other global benchmarks, throwing the global oil market into disarray.
“In January, WTI, which usually trades at a premium of $1-$2 a barrel to Brent, fell sharply, leaving it at a discount of almost $12 – a record gap. This dislocation in the market continued well into the summer.
“From January, Saudi Arabia will base the price of oil for its US customers on a new index developed by Argus, the London-based oil pricing company.”
Source: Javier Blas, Financial Times, October 28, 2009.
David Fuller (Fullermoney): Gold is “hard money”
“In my experience, some of the investment managers who know the least about gold are most vehemently opposed to it. Several have told me that they ‘hate gold’, or words to that effect. The gist of their reason: ‘If you are bullish of gold you expect everything else to collapse.’ They view gold as the Armageddon story.
“I don’t see it that way. I regard gold as ‘hard money’ in a fiat currency world. Unlike paper money which is often printed with abandon, gold is a supply inelasticity story.
“The best reasons for not investing in gold bullion, I believe, are because it has no yield, is hard to value beyond the eye of the beholder, and fluctuates in price. The later factor means that gold can be out of favour for a long time, as we saw from its bubble peak in 1980 until 2001.
“It can also be in favour for a long time and I maintain that it is in a secular bull market which is likely to end in a bout of gold fever at some stage. There is no sign of this euphoria today.”
Source: David Fuller, Fullermoney, October 29, 2009.
Telegraph: Miners’ debt problems threaten higher prices
“The study by the accountancy group tracked the performance of a sample of the world’s largest listed mining and metals companies over almost three decades. It showed that debt levels remain a major concern across the mining and metals sector because of the dramatic levels of borrowing that occurred during the peak of the cycle in 2007 and 2008.
“Lee Downham, the firm’s mining and metals partner, thinks the industry will struggle to bridge the future supply gap and he sees a return to equity funding instead of using bank borrowing in the sector.
“‘We will see a return to equity as the major source of growth funding, together with innovative transactions less reliant on debt funding,’ Mr Downham said. ‘We also predict an increasing role for sovereign wealth and private capital and possibly even a return to initial public offerings and separate listings for individual mine projects.’
“The firm also believes that the debt burden will mean that acquisitions by listed mining and metals companies will more often be proposed on the basis of all-share swaps, with little or no cash element involved.”
Source: Garry White, Telegraph, October 25, 2009.
Telegraph: Buy food – price rises are almost guaranteed
“However, this also provides a great investment opportunity and now is a good time to buy into many areas of food production and distribution.
“In September, sugar prices hit a 28-year high after the failure of crops in India due to the poor monsoon season. Prices have fallen about 20% since then, but are still likely to charge ahead over the longer term.
“Cocoa prices are also close to a 30-year high after a mixed harvest in Ivory Coast. Production of the bean is expected to be 100,000 metric tonnes lower this year than the 1.22 million tonnes produced in the country last year.
“Weather is partly to blame for the cocoa problem – the other issue is the age of the trees. Older cocoa trees yield less cocoa.
“These multi-decade highs in food staple prices have been caused by constraints in the supply side of the equation. However, it is the demand side of the equation that provides compelling evidence that prices are trending upwards.
“In a recent report called The End of Cheap Food, analysts and economists from Standard Chartered have calculated that food production would need to rise by a staggering 70% by 2050 if the world’s population is to remain adequately fed.
“The emerging market-focused bank argues that water will become scarcer and restricted availability of arable land will increase imbalances in food production, while rising biofuels production will deny an increasing amount of grain output for human consumption.
“Whilst food production will continue to rise, the gap between increasing demand and slowing supply will ensure food prices will rise – and stay high, it says.”
Source: Garry White, Telegraph, October 25, 2009.
MoneyNews: Andy Xie – beware huge China property bubble
People are looking at the bubbles as a way to gain economic growth in the short term,’ Xie said on Bloomberg Television.
“‘They are not sure of long-term damages that they may suffer.’
“The Communist Party cabinet is carrying on with monetary and fiscal stimulus, even though the economy surpassed the government’s forecasts for the first nine months of the year.
“As a result of that policy, property sales – and property values – have soared there, while America and Europe have struggled.
“The Chinese government financed a $585 billion stimulus package and banks extended a new record $1.27 trillion of credit. China’s economy expanded 8.9% in the third quarter, while housing prices climbed at the quickest pace in a year.
“‘Land prices have become so elevated,’ said Xie, who accurately predicted in April 2007 China’s looming equities downturn.
“‘The economy has become so dependent on property and the prices are so high and it carries a lot of risk for the country going forward.'”
Source: Gene Koprowski, MoneyNews, October 26, 2009.
Financial Times: Brazil keeps economic excitement in check
“The threat of political interference used to hang over Brazil’s economy like a black cloud. Yet Mr Meirelles explains with customary aplomb that by joining the centrist PMDB, Brazil’s biggest political party, he is only exploring possibilities. He may enter politics at next October’s general election, perhaps running for the senate; he may stay at the bank; or he may rejoin the private sector.
“‘I am merely taking an option on my future,’ he tells the FT at the central bank’s offices in São Paulo.
“Whatever his choice, investors appear unperturbed. Even a 2% tax on foreign portfolio investments, imposed last week to stem the rise of the currency, seemed unlikely to cause more than a pause in the flood of capital to Brazil this year. Brazil’s benchmark Bovespa index dropped on the news but quickly rebounded, and the real continues to appreciate. It has gained 36% against the US dollar so far this year. The stock market is higher than before the collapse of Lehman Brothers.
“Hosting the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympic Games has added to Brazil’s sense of arrival on the world stage.
“Other concerns must be addressed before the country fulfils its enormous potential. Former president Fernando Henrique Cardoso identifies four main challenges. ‘Brazil suffers from a shortage of infrastructure, poor quality of education, environmental issues and crime.’ Mr Cardoso’s fears on that last point have been underlined by the violence in Rio’s favelas.
“Such realism helps explain why Brazilian self-confidence is different from the swagger of fellow Bric countries, such as China and India. Rational optimism, rather than irrational exuberance, is what you encounter among São Paulo’s bankers and business leaders.”
Source: Lionel Barber, Jonathan Wheatley and John Paul Rathbone, Financial Times, October 25, 2009.
4 comments to Words from the (investment) wise for the week that was (Oct 26 – Nov 1, 2009)
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE