<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: US still burdened by financial woes</title> <atom:link href="http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2010/02/02/us-still-burdened-by-financial-woes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2010/02/02/us-still-burdened-by-financial-woes/</link> <description>Prieur du Plessis’s international investment blog</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator> <item><title>By: Warren</title><link>http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2010/02/02/us-still-burdened-by-financial-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-23073</link> <dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:19:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentpostcards.com/?p=16704#comment-23073</guid> <description>My understanding of the AIG debacle is that the London trading desk of AIG entered into Credit Default Swaps (CDSs)without hedging their position(s). Insurance companies are mostly regulated at the state level which might explain why AIG&#039;s London activities were not adequately monitored by regulators. Although incredibly stupid from a risk management standpoint, it does not appear to be illegal to take bets with Credit Default Swaps without laying off an appropriate amount of risk to others or hedging one&#039;s position(s).I think the American taxpayer wants to hear that all of the irresponsible traders in AIG&#039;s London office were let go (without severance or bonuses)and civil law action was taken to recoup any losses caused by traders who failed to follow any risk management parameters that hopefully were in place but tragically ignored! If my understanding of AIG&#039;s travails are incorrect, please comment and elaborate.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding of the AIG debacle is that the London trading desk of AIG entered into Credit Default Swaps (CDSs)without hedging their position(s). Insurance companies are mostly regulated at the state level which might explain why AIG&#8217;s London activities were not adequately monitored by regulators. Although incredibly stupid from a risk management standpoint, it does not appear to be illegal to take bets with Credit Default Swaps without laying off an appropriate amount of risk to others or hedging one&#8217;s position(s).</p><p>I think the American taxpayer wants to hear that all of the irresponsible traders in AIG&#8217;s London office were let go (without severance or bonuses)and civil law action was taken to recoup any losses caused by traders who failed to follow any risk management parameters that hopefully were in place but tragically ignored! If my understanding of AIG&#8217;s travails are incorrect, please comment and elaborate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.investmentpostcards.com @ 2012-02-12 04:04:35 by W3 Total Cache -->
