Rating agency feud: S&P vs. Dagong
By Prieur du Plessis, on August 7th, 2010 posted in: Guest Bloggers, Rating Agencies Leave your comment
This post is a guest contribution by Dian Chu, market analyst, trader and author of the Economic Forecasts and Opinions blog.
It all started almost a month ago when Dagong, the largest credit-rating agency in China, took on S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. Dagong issued its first international sovereign risk report on July 11 by giving 27 countries out of the 50 a markedly different rating than the Western big three.
Dagong did not stop there. It also openly slammed the Western rivals in a Financial Time interview by stating that:
“The reason for the global financial crisis and debt crisis in Europe is that the current international credit-rating system does not correctly reveal the debtor’s repayment ability.”
Guan Jianzhong, chairman of Dagong later also criticized Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch of becoming politicized, “too close to the clients”, ideological and losing their objectivity.
Harold “Terry” McGraw III, the chairman and chief executive of McGraw-Hill companies, which own Standard & Poor’s credit agency, finally went on record and told the Financial Times on August 3 that S&P, Moody’s and Fitch Ratings were being made populists’ scapegoats.
According to FT, McGraw’s populism remark was partially directed to Dagong. McGraw also questioned Dagong’s own transparency and methodology, and said “I haven’t seen that much on the analysis part”.
As for S&P’s role in the financial crisis, McGraw said the agency had merely made “a few honest, technical mistakes” to have totally missed on the U.S. housing recession. (You think the House oversight committee would beg to differ?)
Less than 24 hours later, in an exclusive interview with Xinhua, Guan rebutted S&P with some sharp replies as reported by Xinhua:
“The accusation is irresponsible for the Western rating firm to label a new-born international rating agency as “populist”, instead of carrying out self-criticism on its own highly politicized rating standards.
“Standard & Poor’s failed to identify the debtor nations’ currency depreciation, which infringed on the interests of the creditor nations, as the sovereign debt default. Such practice is the fundamental cause weighing on the instability of the international credit system.”
Moreover, Quan said the independence of some U.S. rating firms needs to be questioned due to the close relationship between the shareholders and their clients, adding Warren Buffett is the largest shareholder in Moody’s.
Interestingly, separate news reports said Dagong might delay its American credit-rating market entry plans, after the SEC had in April this year rejected Dagong’s application, as it does not have local offices or provided ratings services to American companies.
Meanwhile, Standard & Poor’s assigned Moody’s a BBB-plus rating on Tuesday. Moody’s association with Dagong via a three-year co-op agreement back in 1999 probably has absolutely nothing to do with this downgrade.
However, since McGraw did say he thought S&P would come out of the current period “bigger, better and stronger”, could Fitch be the next on S&P’s downgrade list?
Source: Dian Chu, Economic Forecasts & Opinions, August 5, 2010.
More on this topic (What's this?)
Read more on S&P 500 (SPX) at Wikinvest
Nearly 70% Of S&P 500 Stocks In Correction Or Bear Market Territory (Disciplined Approach to Investing, 8/23/15)
S&P Approaches Critical Tipping Point (Capital Essence's Investment Blo..., 9/8/15)
S&P500 Getting Ready to Break (the Underground Investor, 8/19/15)
Top 100 Financial Blogs
Charts & Indexes
Don Coxe’s Weekly Webcast
Calendar of Posts
Daily Charting Update
Try MarketClub for 30 Days for just $8.95 – Click Here!
Boost Blog Traffic
Quote of the Day
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE