Sell in May and go away: fact or fallacy?
Where is the stock market heading? Is the cyclical bull market that started in early March 2009 close to exhaustion? These are the key questions on all investors’ minds as financial markets remain caught between the easy money actions policies of central banks on the one hand, and a still tentative economic outlook on the other.
It is therefore no wonder that even so-called “pop analysis”, including some legendary axioms, is resorted to in a quest for direction. And besides “buy low and sell high” few other axioms are more widely propagated than “sell in May and go away”. A Google search revealed an astounding 12 million items featuring this phrase.
As equities have seen a particularly strong rally since August 2010, investors are justifiably questioning the market’s next move. And they nervously wonder whether this May will not only herald longer days in the Northern Hemisphere, but also live up to its reputation as the advent of a corrective phase in the markets.
The important issue, however, is whether this axiom actually has any scientific basis at all. Analyzing historical returns, the figures vary from market to market, but long-term statistics seem to show that the best time to be invested in equities is the six months from early November through to the end of April of the next year (“good” periods), while the “bad” periods normally occur over the six months from May to October.
A study of the MSCI World Index, a commonly used benchmark for global equity markets, reveals that since 1969 “good” periods returned +6.5% per annum while investors were actually in the red by -1.0% per annum during the “bad” periods.
“Sell in May and go away” also holds true for the US stock markets. An updated study by Plexus Asset Management of the S&P 500 Index shows that the returns of the “good” six-month periods from January 1950 to April 2011 were 8.1% per annum whereas those of the “bad” periods were 2.4% per annum.
A study of the pattern in monthly returns reveals that the “bad” periods of the S&P 500 Index are quite distinct, with five of the six months from May to October having lower average monthly returns than the six months of the good periods. Interestingly, May – the first month of the bad patch – is the only exception.
But what exactly does this mean for the investor who contemplates timing the market by selling in May and reinvesting in November? Further analysis shows that had one kept the investment in the S&P 500 Index only during the “good” six-month periods, and reinvested the proceeds in the money market during the “bad” six-month periods, the total return would have been 10.5% per annum.
These calculations do not take tax into account. And, of course, every time one switches out of and back into the stock market there are costs involved, which would also reduce the returns for the market timer.
How did the good and bad periods stack up during the past two years? The results are as follows.
Some you win, some you don’t! It seems that the axiom “sell in May and go away” in itself is a rather doubtful basis for timing equity investments. However, it may serve a useful purpose as input, together with other factors, to otherwise rational decision making.
In the video clip below, James Mackintosh, FT’s investment editor, analyses the maxim’s record and considers whether to heed it this year.
Click here or on the image below to watch the video.
Source: Financial Times, April 29, 2011.
More on this topic (What's this?)
Zayo Bumps Affiniti Off of EAGLE-Net (Telecom Ramblings, 7/17/15)
Company Update (NASDAQ:MDLZ): Mondelez in talks with multiple parties to sell Carte Noire (Jutia Group, 7/2/15)
Recent Sell (The DIV-Net, 5/27/15)
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE