James Paulsen likes emerging-market stocks on interest rates

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

James Paulsen, chief investment strategist at Wells Capital Management, talks about the outlook for emerging-market economies and stocks. He also discusses his strategy for U.S. equities.

Source: Bloomberg, November 7, 2011.

Did you enjoy this post? If so, click here to subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.

OverSeas Radio Network

Emerging markets are undervalued

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

Investors in emerging markets have had a difficult year in 2011 and analysts are expecting them to underperform the developed world in 2012 in spite of the European crisis and sluggish growth in the US. Jonathan Garner, Morgan Stanley’s Chief Asia and Emerging Markets Strategist, says that scares over a hard landing for the Chinese economy and fallout from Europe mean valuations are now cheap.

Please click here or on the image below to watch the video.

Source: Josh Noble, Financial Times, November 2, 2011.

Did you enjoy this post? If so, click here to subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.

More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on Emerging Markets at Wikinvest
OverSeas Radio Network

Is derating of emerging-market stocks justified?

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

The dividend yield of the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund (EEM) recently moved above the dividend yield of the iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (IVV) for the first time since the 2008/2009 financial crisis.

Sources: iShares; Plexus Asset Management.

Sources: iShares; Plexus Asset Management.

The 76% increase in the dividend from EEM for the six months to June put the fund’s dividend yield on par with that of the IVV, but the continued market turmoil resulted in emerging-market equities significantly underperforming the S&P 500 Index.

Sources: iShares; Plexus Asset Management.

The sell-off resulted in the ratio of the dividend yield of the EEM relative to that of the IVV lingering close to the peaks that prevailed during the 2008/2009 crisis.

Sources: iShares; Plexus Asset Management.

The severe underperformance of the EEM in 2008 was justified as dividends were slashed by 30% over the following 12 months.

Sources: iShares; Plexus Asset Management.

By comparing the EEM’s underperformance against the IVV this time round, it seems that the markets are anticipating a cut of the same proportion over the next 12 months.

Sources: iShares; Plexus Asset Management.

Is the cold shoulder the market is giving emerging-market equities justified at this stage? I would say not. During the 2008/09 crisis the emerging-market currency I derived at by dividing the MSCI Emerging Market Index in US dollar by the MSCI Emerging Market Index in local currency terms fell by 22% and therefore contributed to the bulk of the slash in dividends. This time round the same MSCI Emerging Market Currency Index fell by only 7%. I am not professing that further depreciation is not on the cards. What I am saying is that given the current state of affairs the significant derating of emerging-market equities is not justified in light of dividend expectations.

Continue reading Is derating of emerging-market stocks justified?

More on this topic (What's this?)
Is Derating of Emerging Market Stocks Justified?
Mid-Month ETF Update, Holding Bonds
Read more on Plexus, Barclays, Asset Management at Wikinvest
OverSeas Radio Network

Is emerging market growth at risk?

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

This post is a guest contribution by Manoj Pradhan of Morgan Stanley.

EM risky assets and currencies saw a sharp sell-off over the last two weeks. At the same time, the Bank of Israel joined the central banks of Turkey, Brazil and Russia in easing monetary policy, while China has already eased fiscally. Are forward-looking markets predicting a turn for the worse in the last bastion of the global recovery – EM growth? And is the monetary response likely to become more widespread? In our view, EM growth will still handsomely outperform DM growth over the business cycle, but it will not be immune to the downside in DM growth that appears to become more entrenched with each day that passes without a convincing policy response.

With DM policy gridlocked and growth moving dangerously close to recession as our base case, the only way to square the circle from a global perspective is either to expect EM growth to weaken meaningfully, or for EM policy to ease either aggressively or then at least pre-emptively (see Emerging Issues: Structural Alpha, Cyclical Beta, August 15, 2011). We have argued that more EM central banks are likely to respond to global growth risks by easing policy before 2011 ends. Some may worry right now about easing policy and exacerbating currency weakness, but delaying easing could put EM growth at risk and would require much more aggressive easing down the road.

Currency weakness: Symptom, not cause: Currency weakness is not something that needs to be addressed by policy-makers as an objective in itself. Rather, the recent weakness simply reflects a rise in the EM risk premium as investors take EM risk off the table due to: (i) a rising risk of economic and financial contagion from the DM world to EM economies; (ii) the reluctance or inability of DM policy-makers to respond convincingly to debt and growth concerns; and (iii) the reluctance of EM policy-makers to respond aggressively or pre-emptively to the risks to EM growth. While EM policy-makers can do very little about the first two concerns, they appear to have become more willing to address the third.

In doing so, they also address the risk premium that caused the sharp currency sell-off. Further currency weakness in line with monetary easing would then likely be orderly, not an indication of panic or de-risking. A reversal in currency weakness could come from aggressive monetary easing by DM economies (implying DM currency weakness and hence EM appreciation) or from an improvement in the prospects for EM growth and valuations. At the moment, there is very little appetite to use policy options aggressively to insulate growth, in which case it becomes exigent that easing be provided pre-emptively. A small but important set of EM economies are doing just that.

Easing is easier for some: Monetary easing in EM is not an open-and-shut case because global risks have to be balanced off against domestic issues. The global slowdown has complicated matters for many EM economies for at least three reasons. First, having just finished monetary tightening as part of a nine-month battle with inflation, the textbook prescription would be to keep monetary policy at its new, tighter stance and crush inflation expectations, sacrificing growth if need be. Inflation continues to be the primary concern for many EM economies including China, India, Brazil and Poland (among others), and an early reversal of policy tightening could push inflation higher. Second, the currency sell-off will likely worry many about their ability to cut policy rates (since this could exacerbate currency weakness), but is particularly a problem for the likes of Hungary (given its foreign currency loans – see FX Mortgage Plan Raises Deleveraging Risks, September 26, 2011) and Poland (given the impact of a weaker currency on debt, which is not far from the 55% ceiling that government is keen to avoid breaching – see “Poland: Election Preview – Poles to the Polls”, CEEMEA Macro Monitor, September 23, 2011). Finally, some LatAm central banks continue to face robust growth and would likely have kept raising rates had it not been for the emergence of global growth risks.

Continue reading Is emerging market growth at risk?

OverSeas Radio Network

Emerging-market equities – potential for strong outperformance!

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

Emerging-market equities have underperformed mature-market equities since the start of the year, with the MSCI Emerging Market Index down 1.4% while the MSCI World Index is up 2.04% and the S&P 500 4.6%. This raises the question of whether investors have lost faith in emerging-market equities.

Let us first look at the issue of valuation. In order to compare emerging-market equities and the S&P 500, I used two exchange-traded funds (ETFs), namely iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund (EEM) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (IVV). I calculated the annual trailing dividend yields on both since 2004 on a daily basis and compared them in the graph below. Please note that the prices I used were in fact the net asset values of the funds.

But why the dividend yield and not the price-to-earnings ratio, you may ask? Apart from a lack of information regarding the price-to-earnings ratio, I believe dividend yield is a better indication for investors in the ETFs as it is part of their actual returns. Furthermore, dividends are unaffected by accounting policy changes and adjustments that frequently occur and distort the earnings base of companies and indices.

Sources: iShares; Plexus Asset Management.

It is evident that the EEM has generally traded at a premium to the IVV since the EEM was launched, with the dividend yield significantly lower than that of the IVV. The major exception was from the third quarter of 2008 to mid-2009 during the global liquidity crisis sparked by the Lehman saga where the EEM actually traded at a discount to the IVV.

Why should the EEM trade at a premium to the IVV? The age-old investment adage of “relative earnings drive relative price”, and in this case “relative dividends drive relative price”, applies. The compounded growth in dividends of the EEM since 2004 has been 11.6% per annum while that of the IVV has been 1.5% per annum.

Sources: iShares; Plexus Asset Management.

The reason why the EEM moved from a premium rating to a discount to the IVV is evident in the graph below. The market expected dividends for the EEM in 2009 to be sliced significantly more than those of the IVV on the back of 2008/2009’s liquidity crisis. As the liquidity crisis eased because global trade normalised, the price of EEM relative to IVV reverted to the relative dividend index and thereby moved to trade at a premium rating to the IVV. Since the fourth quarter of last year the gap between the relative dividend and price indices has opened as more and more black swans entered the global pool. The gap surged at the end of the second quarter, though, after both the EEM and IVV went ex dividend in June.

Sources: iShares; Plexus Asset Management.

This resulted in the EEM trading on a par with IVV on a dividend yield basis.

Sources: iShares; Plexus Asset Management.

What this is telling me is that the EEM is currently priced in a similar way as in June 2008 just before the 2008/2009 liquidity crisis started in earnest.

Sources: iShares; Plexus Asset Management.

My reading is therefore that the EEM is priced for an imminent global financial disaster.

Sources: iShares; Plexus Asset Management.

I do not know whether such a disaster is indeed imminent, but I can play around with various scenarios, such as the Eurozone crumbling, the debt situation of local authorities in China catching up with them, another earthquake disaster in Japan, etc. But no one can tell.

Continue reading Emerging-market equities – potential for strong outperformance!

OverSeas Radio Network

Emerging economies – short-term gain, longer-term pain?

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

This post is a guest contribution by Manoj Pradhan of Morgan Stanley.

Rather than signaling an extended period of tightening, China’s latest policy rate hike is expected to be the last of its kind in 2011. In a similar vein, policy headwinds to growth are set to ease in AXJ and LatAm, setting up the stage nicely for a rebound in risk sentiment. Even though most of the policy normalisation is ahead of us in the CEEMEA region, the overall change in sentiment should help here as well. Slowing EM growth will take some of the wind out of the sails of inflation and base effects will kick in over the next 3-4 months to push headline inflation lower, in our view. A macro environment where policy isn’t tightening further, inflation is on the decline and GDP growth is close to trend should be a potent combination for a recovery for risky assets. A final trigger for this change is the prospect for a better 2H in the US that our US team expects.

However, on a longer horizon, EM central banks don’t appear to have dealt with inflation conclusively. Risks to growth and particularly to inflation are to the upside. The ongoing inflation episode starred commodity prices while core inflation stayed benign almost everywhere. The next inflation story is likely to have core inflation in the driver’s seat. Central banks would then likely have to respond with another round of tightening. But this is a story for 2012, not 2011.

It should be noted that inflation in 2012 need not be of a rampant kind or even of a variety that central bankers will not be able to tame. Simply put, the return of EM inflation in 2012 is a risk, which implies that monetary policy tightening could also return. Until we get there, risky assets are likely to remain buoyant in the benign macro environment. In this note, we pay more attention to factors that could lead inflation higher, directing readers to our colleague Chetan Ahya’s note (Asia-Pacific Economics: Nearing the End of Rate Hike Cycle, June 30, 2011) for a detailed analysis surrounding the end of policy normalisation by AXJ central banks.

A Better Macro Environment Should Mean a Return to Risk

Inflation is set to fall in 2H11 in most of the EM economies we cover. We have argued in the past that moderate levels of inflation that most EM economies have at the moment are not a direct threat to economic growth. It is the actions of policy-makers who want to prevent inflation from rising that inflict damage on growth. If they didn’t act, inflation would likely rise to levels where it would directly hurt growth. To add insult to injury, policy-makers would have to then act even more aggressively to bring rampant inflation under control.

Oil and food inflation, which sparked the inflation scare, have been falling across the EM world. More importantly, growth is slowing to trend without a hard landing on the cards. Prima facie, there appears to be little reason for monetary policy to stay restrictive. And indeed, AXJ and LatAm central banks are close to completing the hikes they have in the pipeline for this episode. CEEMEA monetary policy was late to start rate hikes, given that the region’s economic growth lagged the other EM regions and most of the policy normalisation is therefore still ahead of us.

By that rationale, the fall in inflation – thanks in part to the growth slowdown – is likely to satisfy policy-makers and hence keep policy from getting tighter than it already is. Brazil’s monetary policy is the only one set to forge into outright restrictive territory and Turkey is likely to flirt with this boundary. However, in China and India – the other two economies where monetary policy is slightly restrictive – monetary policy is set to ease from its current slightly restrictive stance to a neutral one. In China, the policy stance could well ease over the summer and in India around six months down the line. This should set the stage nicely for a return to risk.

Caveat Emptor – The Second Coming of EMflation…in 2012

However, something will eventually have to give from the combination of falling inflation, economic growth at trend and policy rates on hold. Not just because it always does, but also because we argue that EM policy-makers, fully cognisant of the risks to US and global growth, have not been aggressive enough to put a more lasting dent in inflation. Our simple argument in this note is that, if these risks abate, and our economics teams expect them to, then the cyclical risks to EM growth and particularly to inflation are to the upside.

A familiar side-effect of better-quality global growth is higher commodity prices. However, unlike the 1H11 episode of EM inflation, it is not commodity shocks that are central to our argument here. Rather, it is that policy on hold and growth at trend render the EM world susceptible to upside risks, as we discuss below.

In addition to the cyclical arguments, structural drivers should keep inflation risks to the upside. Rather interestingly, the structural issues are set up such that EM inflation can rise even without an increase in the current level of EM growth.

Continue reading Emerging economies – short-term gain, longer-term pain?

More on this topic (What's this?)
Why TIPS are a Bad Inflation Hedge
The Real Inflation Rate is 10%
Read more on Inflation at Wikinvest
OverSeas Radio Network
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Top 100 Financial Blogs

Recent Posts

Charts & Indexes

Gold Price (US$)

Don Coxe’s Weekly Webcast

 
Current call: Thursday, January 27, 2012

Podcast – Dow Jones


One minute - every hour - weekdays
(requires Windows Media Player)
newsflashr network
National Debt Clock

Calendar of Posts

February 2012
MTWTFSS
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829 

Feed the Bull