Fleckenstein: Fed is printing money to cover bank theft, leading to global food Inflation

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

The Fed printing money to cover bank theft is causing food riots worldwide, says Bill Fleckenstein on MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan Show. Fleckenstein is a hedge fund manager and president of Seattle-based Fleckenstein Capital.

Source: MSNBC (via YouTube), March 1, 2011 (hat tip: Financial Doom Blog).

Did you enjoy this post? If so, click here to subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.

OverSeas Radio Network

FOMC policy statement – status quo, but cautiously bullish

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

This post is a guest contribution by Asha Bangalore, economist of The Northern Trust  Company.

The FOMC left the federal funds rate band 0%-0.25% intact, no surprises here. Several modifications to the March statement were necessary in light of recent economic reports pointing to improving economic conditions. Here are the changes from the March 16, 2010 meeting:

Fed funds rate: In today’s statement, the much cited phrase “warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period” was left untouched.

Dissent – President Hoenig of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas has now dissented at three consecutive meetings. In Hoenig’s opinion, the exceptionally low level of the federal funds rate is no longer necessary and it has the potential to build up “financial imbalances and increase risks to longer-run macroeconomic and financial stability.”

Economy: In its March statement, economic activity was seen to be strengthening. Today, the Fed retained this view. The labor market is now seen as “improving” compared with the March portrayal that it is “stabilizing”. Restraints from high unemployment, modest income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit continue to be pertinent factors holding back the pace of consumer spending. In today’s missive, consumer spending is deemed to have “picked up” vs. “expanding at a moderate rate” in the March statement. Although housing starts are at a depressed level, they have “edged up,” which is more bullish than the March statement when housing starts were seen as flat.

Inflation: The language regarding inflation was left intact vs. the March statement.  Inflation is predicted to be subdued for some time.

Fed’s balance sheet: The Fed’s portfolio includes $1.25 trillion agency mortgage-backed securities, an asset acquired to stabilize the housing market and hold down mortgage rates. The widespread speculation that today’s announcement would include indications of the Fed’s plan to liquidate these holdings proved incorrect. Undoubtedly, the meeting would have included discussions about the balance sheet of the Fed. In our opinion, the outright sale of mortgage-backed securities is many months ahead and will be tied to developments in the housing market. In the early stages of tightening monetary policy, reverse repos, term deposits and higher interest rates on excess reserves will be favored over sale of mortgage-backed securities.

Further insight on the Fed’s decision is also provided in the video clip below, featuring Ken Volpert, a Vanguard principal, and Bill Gross, co-CIO & founder of Pimco.

Sources: Northern Trust – Daily Global Commentary, April 29, 2010 and CNBC, April 28, 2010.

Did you enjoy this post? If so, click here to subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.

OverSeas Radio Network

Ron Paul asks Fed about gold dealings

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

The following comments come from Chris Powell of Gold AntiTrust Action (GATA):

During last Friday’s hearing of the House Financial Services Committee on his legislation to audit the Federal Reserve System, US Rep. Ron Paul asked the Fed’s general counsel, Scott G. Alvarez, whether the Fed has ever been involved in the gold market. Four days earlier GATA had disclosed the Fed’s admission that it has records of its “gold swap arrangements” with “foreign banks” that it wants to conceal from the public. (Click here.)

Replying to Paul, Alvarez professed to have no expertise in the matter of intervention in the gold market but added that he could get Paul such information. Paul replied that one purpose of his audit legislation was to determine whether the US government was intervening in the gold market by using other governments as intermediaries.

That surely is one reason for the Fed’s hysterical opposition to Paul’s bill. Let’s hope Paul followed up by asking for the gold intervention information Alvarez claimed not to have.

You can watch the exchange between Paul and Alvarez at YouTube below. (The section involving gold begins at about 5 minutes and 30 seconds into the video.)

Source: Chris Powell, GATA, September 28, 2008 and YouTube, September 27, 2009.

And while we are on the topic of Ron Paul, his new book, “End the Fed” should be on your list of prescribed reading.


Did you enjoy this post? If so, click here to subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.

OverSeas Radio Network

Top 100 Financial Blogs

Recent Posts

Charts & Indexes

Gold Price (US$)

Don Coxe’s Weekly Webcast

Podcast – Dow Jones

One minute - every hour - weekdays
(requires Windows Media Player)
newsflashr network
National Debt Clock

Calendar of Posts

December 2020
« Jan  

Feed the Bull