Goldman’s day in Congress – in pictures

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

If you missed the 11-hour congressional flogging of Goldman on Tuesday, below is a reenactment, courtesy of Agora Financial’s 5 minute forecast.

You guys are evil Wall Street bookies, crooked car salesmen,
cheating blackjack dealers. Admit it.

Seriously?

Levin: Is it ethical for market makers to not disclose adversarial positions?
McCain: Hey, don’t ask me, Carl. Economics is not my strong suit.

What about you, Frenchie… “Mister Tour-eh.” I’m going to curse a little bit and scare you into confession. But I’m quoting a Goldman e-mail, so it’s OK: How many “sh*tty deals” did you sell to clients?

I “categorically deny this allegation.”
And “it’s [pronounced] ‘tour,’ not ‘tour-eh.’”

The end.

Source: Agora Financial’s 5 minute forecast, April 28, 2010.

Did you enjoy this post? If so, click here to subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.

OverSeas Radio Network

The case against Goldman – fact or fiction

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

Blogger and author Barry Ritholtz (The Big Picture) separates fact from fiction in the allegations of fraud made by the SEC against Goldman Sachs in an interview with Dylan Ratigan.

Barry tells me his post 10 Things You Don’t Know (or were misinformed) About the GS Case is turning out to be the most popular article he had ever written. His list follows below, with the video interview at the end.

1.  This is a weak case: Actually, no — it’s a very strong case. Based upon what is in the SEC complaint, parts of the case are a slam dunk. The claim Paulson & Co. were long $200 million dollars when they were actually short is a material misrepresentation — that’s Rule 10b-5, and it’s a no brainer. The rest is gravy.

2.  Robert Khuzami is a bad ass, no-nonsense, thorough, awardwinning prosecutor:  This guy is the real deal — he busted terrorist rings, broke up the mob, took down security frauds. He is now the director of SEC enforcement. He is fearless, and was awarded the Attorney General’s Exceptional Service Award (1996), for “extraordinary courage and voluntary risk of life in performing an act resulting in direct benefits to the Department of Justice or the nation”.

When you prosecute mass murderers who use guns and bombs and threaten your life, and you kick their asses anyway, you ain’t afraid of a group of billionaire bankers and their spreadsheets. He is the shit. My advice to anyone on Wall Street in his crosshairs: if you are indicted in a case by Khuzami, do yourself a big favor: ettle.

3.  Goldman lost $90 million dollars, hence, they are innocent:  This is a civil, not a criminal case. Hence, any mens rea — guilty mind — does not matter. Did they or did they not violate the letter of the law? That is all that matters, regardless of what they were thinking — or their P&L.

4.  ACA is a victim in this case: Not exactly, it was an active participant in ratings gaming. Look at the back and forth between Paulson’s selection and ACA’s management. 55 items in the synthetic CDO were added and removed. Why?

What ACA was doing was gaming the ratings agencies for their investment grade, Triple AAA ratings approval. Their expertise (if you can call it that) was knowing exactly how much junk they could include in the CDO to raise yield, yet still get investment grade from Moody’s or S&P. They are hardly an innocent party in this.

5.  This was only one incident: The market sure as hell doesn’t think so — it whacked 15% off of Goldman’s market cap. The aggressive SEC posture, the huge reaction from Goldie, and the short-term market verdict all suggest there is more coming.

If it were only this one case, and there was nothing else worrisome behind it, GS would have written a check and quietly settled this. Their reaction (some say over-reaction) belies that theory. I suspect this is a tip of the iceberg, with lots more problematic synthetics behind it.

And not just at GS. I suspect the kids over at Deutsche Bank, Merrill and Morgan are working furiously to review their various CDOs deals.

6.  The timing of this case is suspect: More coincidental, really. The Wells notice (notification from the SEC that they intend to recommend enforcement) was over eight months ago. The White House is not involved in the timing of the suit itself, it is a lower-level staff decision.

7.  This is a complex case:  Again, no. Parts of it are a little more sophisticated than others, but this is a simple case of fraud/misrepresentation. The most difficult part of this case is likely to turn on what is a “material omission.” Paulson’s role in selecting mortgages may or may not be material — that is an issue of fact for a jury to determine.  But complex? Not even close.

8.  The case looks thin: What we see in the complaint is the bare minimum the prosecutor has to reveal to make his case. What you don’t see are all the emails, depositions, interrogations, phone taps, etc. that the prosecutor knows about and GS does not. During the litigation discovery process, this material slowly gets turned over (some is held back if there are other pending investigations into GS).

Going back to who the prosecutor in this case is: his legal reputation is he is a very thorough, very precise, meticulous litigator. If he decided to recommend bringing a case against the biggest, baddest investment house on Wall Street, I assure you he has a major arsenal of additional evidence you don’t know about. Yet.

Typically, at a certain point the lawyers will tell their client the evidence is overwhelming and advise settling. That is around 6-12 months after the suit has begun.

9.  This case is political: I keep hearing that phrase due to the SEC party vote. It is incorrect. What that means is the case is not political, it means it has been politicized as a defense tactic. There is a huge difference between the two.

10.  I’m not a lawyer, but . . . Then you should not be ignorantly commenting on securities litigation. Why don’t you pour yourself a tall glass of STF up and go sit quietly in the corner.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Source: The Dylan Ratigan Show, April 27, 2010.

Did you enjoy this post? If so, click here to subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.

OverSeas Radio Network

The case against Goldman Sachs, according to Ritholtz

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

Barry Ritholtz, chief executive of FusionIQ and author of the book “Bailout Nation”, talks with Bloomberg’s Deirdre Bolton and Keith McCullough, chief executive of Hedgeye Risk Management, about the outlook for the SEC’s fraud case against Goldman Sachs.

Goldman Sachs chief executive Lloyd Blankfein and six current and former company employees are scheduled to testify before the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations from later today.

Click here or on the image below to view the video.

Source: Bloomberg (via YouTube), April 26, 2010.

Did you enjoy this post? If so, click here to subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.

OverSeas Radio Network

Gerald Celente: Finance reform – just a show

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

Wall Street regulation is the hot topic today; President Barack Obama gave a speech to the finance industry encouraging them to join him in reforming Wall Street. Gerald Celente says that there is a huge problem with Obama’s Financial Reform bill because the same people that got us into this economic mess are the ones advising Obama.

Source: YouTube, April 22, 2010.

Did you enjoy this post? If so, click here to subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.

OverSeas Radio Network

Wall Street more powerful than before the crisis?

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

A handful of Wall Street banks have become more powerful and influential during the financial crisis. Simon Johnson, co-author of the new book 13 Bankers: The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown, argues that minding banks too big to fail isn’t enough. He tells WSJ columnist David Weidner that big banks need to be broken up into pieces “small enough to fail”.

Source: The Wall Street Journal, March 31, 2010.

Did you enjoy this post? If so, click here to subscribe to updates to Investment Postcards from Cape Town by e-mail.

OverSeas Radio Network

Video-o-rama: On financial regulation and more

 EmailPrint This Post Print This Post

Below is a short compilation of a few interesting video clips on the whole regulation saga and the state of the banks.

One-on-one with Timothy Geithner

Source: CNBC, March 29, 2010.

SEC’s Mary Schapiro on financial regulation

Source: CNBC, March 29, 2010.

FDIC’s Sheila Bair on the state of banks

Source: CNBC, March 29, 2010.

Elizabeth Warren on payback of the TARP

Source: CNBC, March 29, 2010

OverSeas Radio Network

Top 100 Financial Blogs

Recent Posts

Charts & Indexes

Gold Price (US$)

Don Coxe’s Weekly Webcast

Podcast – Dow Jones


One minute - every hour - weekdays
(requires Windows Media Player)
newsflashr network
National Debt Clock

Calendar of Posts

January 2021
MTWTFSS
« Jan  
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Feed the Bull